Secondary Ulnar Nerve Reconstruction of High Ulnar Nerve Injuries: A Comparative Study of Sural Grafting and Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer

被引:0
作者
Marvast, Ali Dehghan [1 ]
Aliakbari, Mohsen [1 ]
Monzavi, Amir Mohammad [1 ]
Salehi, Ashkan [1 ]
Shahsavan, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthoped Surg, Esfahan, Iran
来源
ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS | 2025年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
Anterior Interosseous Nerve; High Ulnar Nerve Injury; Nerve Graft; Nerve Transfer; Sural Nerve; DISTAL NERVE; OUTCOMES; SHOULDER; REPAIR; MOTOR; DISABILITIES; MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY; FOREARM; LEVEL;
D O I
10.22038/ABJS.2024.83645.3806
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: High ulnar nerve injuries often cause severe functional impairment, and the best secondary repair method remains debated. This study compared the effectiveness of sural nerve grafting and anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) transfer following failed primary ulnar nerve repairs. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 42 patients with isolated high ulnar nerve injuries who required secondary surgical intervention. Patients were allocated to either the sural nerve grafting (n = 23) or AIN transfer (n = 19) group based on predefined clinical criteria. Motor and sensory functions were assessed using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system and a two-point discrimination (2PD) test. Grip and pinch strength were measured, and functional recovery was evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: The AIN transfer group exhibited significantly superior motor recovery, with 68.5% of patients achieving BMRC grades M4-M5, compared to only 17.4% in the sural grafting group (P = 0.03). Sensory recovery was also markedly better in the AIN group, with a higher proportion of patients reaching BMRC sensory grades S3-S4 (P = 0.04). Additionally, the AIN transfer group demonstrated significantly greater grip strength (30.1 +/- 6.1 kg vs. 24.3 +/- 5.2 kg; P = 0.03) and pinch strength (7.2 +/- 1.5 kg vs. 5.8 +/- 1.3 kg; P = 0.04). Improvement in DASH scores was more substantial in the AIN group (-26.6 +/- 5.7 vs. -14.6 +/- 4.3; P = 0.02), indicating better functional recovery. Although the AIN group showed a trend toward improved 2PD, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.18). Conclusion: AIN transfer provides superior outcomes compared to sural nerve grafting for the secondary repair of high ulnar nerve injuries, demonstrating significantly enhanced motor and sensory recovery, grip and pinch strength, and overall functional improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 358
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Supercharged end-to-side anterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore intrinsic function in high ulnar nerve injury: a prospective cohort study [J].
Abaskhron, Mina ;
Ezzat, Mostafa ;
Boulis, Andrew Gamal ;
El Safoury, Yasser .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
[2]   Effectiveness of Distal Nerve Transfers for Claw Correction With Proximal Ulnar Nerve Lesions [J].
Arami, Amir ;
Bertelli, Jayme Augusto .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 46 (06) :478-484
[3]   Supercharged End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer for Intrinsic Musculature Reinnervation [J].
Barbour, John ;
Yee, Andrew ;
Kahn, Lorna C. ;
Mackinnon, Susan E. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 37A (10) :2150-2159
[4]   Comparison of ulnar nerve repair according to injury level and type [J].
Basar, Hakan ;
Basar, Betul ;
Erol, Bulent ;
Tetik, Cihangir .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (10) :2123-2128
[5]   Assessment, patient selection, and rehabilitation of nerve transfers [J].
Bateman, Emma A. ;
Larocerie-Salgado, Juliana ;
Ross, Douglas C. ;
Miller, Thomas A. ;
Pripotnev, Stahs .
FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2023, 4
[6]   Current concepts in peripheral nerve surgery [J].
Beris, Alexandros ;
Gkiatas, Ioannis ;
Gelalis, Ioannis ;
Papadopoulos, Dimitrios ;
Kostas-Agnantis, Ioannis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (02) :263-269
[7]   Comparison of nerve conduits and nerve graft in digital nerve regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Braga Silva, J. ;
Leal, B. L. M. ;
Magnus, G. A. ;
de Souza Stanham, V ;
Mattiello, R. ;
Wolff, C. G. .
HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2021, 40 (06) :715-721
[8]   Influences of Repair Site Tension and Conduit Splinting on Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction [J].
Brogan, David M. ;
Dy, Christopher J. ;
Rioux-Forker, Dana ;
Wever, Jason ;
Leversedge, Fraser J. .
HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2022, 17 (06) :1048-1054
[9]   Current concepts in diagnosis and management of common upper limb nerve injuries in children [J].
Catena, Nunzio ;
Di Gennaro, Giovanni Luigi ;
Jester, Andrea ;
Martinez-Alvarez, Sergio ;
Ponten, Eva ;
Soldado, Francisco ;
Steiger, Christina ;
Choong, Jiahui ;
Zarantonello, Paola ;
Farr, Sebastian .
JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 15 (02) :89-96
[10]   Improving peripheral nerve regeneration: From molecular mechanisms to potential therapeutic targets [J].
Chan, K. Ming ;
Gordon, Tessa ;
Zochodne, Douglas W. ;
Power, Hollie A. .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2014, 261 :826-835