Interventions to reduce prejudice against bisexual people and bisexuality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Manalastas, Eric Julian [1 ]
Benjamin, Isabel [2 ]
Blumenau, Helena S. [3 ]
Shea, Em [2 ]
Feinstein, Brian A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Visible Analyt, Prama House,267 Banbury Rd, Oxford OX2 7HT, England
[2] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med & Sci, Dept Psychol, N Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Clin Trials Stat & Data Management Ctr, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
Antibisexual prejudice; prejudice reduction; interventions; systematic review; meta-analysis; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; HETEROSEXUALS ATTITUDES; GAY; CONTACT; SCHOOL; BINEGATIVITY; INDIVIDUALS; ABSTINENCE; REGRESSION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/19419899.2025.2500964
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The persistent prejudice against bisexual people highlights the need for demonstrably effective interventions. Previous systematic reviews have focused on anti-lesbian/gay/bisexual (LGB) prejudice collectively or homonegativity specifically, excluding bisexuality, but it remains unknown to what extent interventions actually work to address antibisexual prejudice. This study is the first comprehensive review of the efficacy of interventions to reduce prejudice against bisexual people and bisexuality. We searched six databases, along with citation searches and calls for unpublished data. We double-screened 9,780 abstracts and 41 full-text papers and identified 20 intervention studies reported in 19 papers involving 3,002 non-bisexual participants. Interventions included approaches such as intergroup contact, multicultural education, cognitive strategies, or a combination. Meta-analysis of the best available causal evidence (i.e., 14 randomised controlled trials) indicated that interventions to date have had limited success, with most demonstrating little or no substantial effect (d = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.15). This finding was robust to methodological and sample-related moderators. Subgroup analysis suggested that combining multicultural education and contact was the most promising approach (d = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.56), but more work is needed to demonstrate reliable, robust reductions in antibisexual prejudice.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 112 条
[71]   Is bisexuality invisible? A review of sexualities scholarship 1970-2015 [J].
Monro, Surya ;
Hines, Sally ;
Osborne, Antony .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2017, 65 (04) :663-681
[72]   Conducting a Meta-Analysis in the Age of Open Science: Tools, Tips, and Practical Recommendations [J].
Moreau, David ;
Gamble, Beau .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 27 (03) :426-432
[73]  
Morin S.F., 1974, HOMOSEXUAL COUNSELIN, V1, P160
[74]   Challenging Binaries by Saying Good Bi: Perceptions of Bisexual Men's Identity Legitimacy [J].
Morrison, Katheryn E. ;
Gruenhage, Jordan M. ;
Pedersen, Cory L. .
JOURNAL OF BISEXUALITY, 2016, 16 (03) :361-376
[75]  
Mulick P.S., 2002, J OFBISEXUALITY, V2, P45, DOI [DOI 10.1300/J159V02N0403, 10.1300/J159v02n04_03, DOI 10.1300/J159V02N04_03]
[76]  
National Institutes of Health, 2022, Notice of Special Interest (NOSI): Research to Address Vaccine Hesitancy, Uptake, and Implementation among Populations that Experience Health Disparities Internet
[77]  
Nieto S., 1992, AFFIRMING DIVERSITY
[78]  
Ochs R., 2009, Getting bi: Voices of bisexuals around the world, V2nd, P201
[79]  
Osgood C. E., 1957, MEASUREMENT MEANING
[80]  
Paluck Elizabeth L., 2019, Behavioural Public Policy, V3, P129, DOI [DOI 10.1017/BPP.2018.25, 10.1017/bpp.2018]