Interventions to reduce prejudice against bisexual people and bisexuality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Manalastas, Eric Julian [1 ]
Benjamin, Isabel [2 ]
Blumenau, Helena S. [3 ]
Shea, Em [2 ]
Feinstein, Brian A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Visible Analyt, Prama House,267 Banbury Rd, Oxford OX2 7HT, England
[2] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med & Sci, Dept Psychol, N Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Clin Trials Stat & Data Management Ctr, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
Antibisexual prejudice; prejudice reduction; interventions; systematic review; meta-analysis; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; HETEROSEXUALS ATTITUDES; GAY; CONTACT; SCHOOL; BINEGATIVITY; INDIVIDUALS; ABSTINENCE; REGRESSION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/19419899.2025.2500964
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The persistent prejudice against bisexual people highlights the need for demonstrably effective interventions. Previous systematic reviews have focused on anti-lesbian/gay/bisexual (LGB) prejudice collectively or homonegativity specifically, excluding bisexuality, but it remains unknown to what extent interventions actually work to address antibisexual prejudice. This study is the first comprehensive review of the efficacy of interventions to reduce prejudice against bisexual people and bisexuality. We searched six databases, along with citation searches and calls for unpublished data. We double-screened 9,780 abstracts and 41 full-text papers and identified 20 intervention studies reported in 19 papers involving 3,002 non-bisexual participants. Interventions included approaches such as intergroup contact, multicultural education, cognitive strategies, or a combination. Meta-analysis of the best available causal evidence (i.e., 14 randomised controlled trials) indicated that interventions to date have had limited success, with most demonstrating little or no substantial effect (d = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.15). This finding was robust to methodological and sample-related moderators. Subgroup analysis suggested that combining multicultural education and contact was the most promising approach (d = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.56), but more work is needed to demonstrate reliable, robust reductions in antibisexual prejudice.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Understanding the Practice, Application, and Limitations of Meta-Analysis [J].
Allen, Mike .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2020, 64 (01) :74-96
[2]  
Allen M, 2014, ROUTL COMMUN SER, P271
[3]  
Allport G., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice
[4]   Correlates of Attitudes Toward Bisexuality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Anderson, Joel ;
Maugeri, Julia .
JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2024, 71 (01) :259-292
[5]  
Banks J.A., 2016, Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching, V6th
[6]  
Barker M., 2014, Encyclopedia of critical psychology, P170, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-728, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-728]
[7]  
Barker MegChristina Richards., 2012, BISEXUALITY REPORT B
[8]   Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it [J].
Barnett, AG ;
van der Pols, JC ;
Dobson, AJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (01) :215-220
[9]   Interventions to Reduce Sexual Prejudice: A Study-Space Analysis and Meta-Analytic Review [J].
Bartos, Sebastian E. ;
Berger, Israel ;
Hegarty, Peter .
JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2014, 51 (04) :363-382
[10]   Bi Us, For Us: Articulating Foundational Principles for Research in Partnership with Bisexual Communities [J].
Beach, Lauren B. ;
Xavier Hall, Casey D. .
JOURNAL OF BISEXUALITY, 2020, 20 (03) :251-272