Welfarism and Person-Centred Justice

被引:1
作者
Semple, Noel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Fac Law, Windsor, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY-LA REVUE CANADIENNE DROIT ET SOCIETE | 2024年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
public policy; access to justice; law reform; philosophy; ETHICS; ACCESS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1017/cls.2024.22
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Welfarism is the idea that government should always try to make individuals' lives go better, for them, than they otherwise would, overall. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate welfarism's compatibility with, and potential to support, the ambitions of person-centred justice. Welfarism is a normative theory applicable to public policy generally, but one which has distinct consequences in the realm of law and legal systems. They are considered just to the extent that they generate the best possible expected welfare consequences for all of the individuals who are affected by them. Welfarism is radically person-centred because it requires lawmakers to treat each individual affected by their work as a distinct locus of value, including those who have been subordinated or ignored.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 598
页数:19
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Adler M.D., 2019, Measuring social welfare
[2]  
Adler Matthew D., 2017, Working Paper EE 17-01 March 2017
[3]  
American Civil Liberties Union, 2016, Racial Disparities In Florida Safety Belt Law Enforcement
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Egan v Canada
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Reference re Same-sex Marriage
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Elmardy v Toronto Police Services Board et al.
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Hryniak v Mauldin
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Canada (Attorney General) v Downtown Eastside Sex Workers United Against Violence Society
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Vriend v Alberta