Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment

被引:3
作者
Lee, David Michael [1 ]
Grose, Elysia [2 ]
Cross, Karen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Med Sci Bldg, Room 31571, Kings Coll Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] St Michaels Hosp, Div Plast Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
diabetic foot ulcer; patient education; patient education materials; online resources; readability; diabetic foot; diabetes; online; AMPUTATION; ONLINE; UNDERSTANDABILITY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.2196/27221
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a common complication of diabetes, little is known about the content and readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for DFU. The recommended reading grade level for these materials is grades 6-8. Objective: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the quality and readability of online PEM on DFU. Methods: A Google search was performed using 4 different search terms related to DFU. Two readability formulas were used to assess the readability of the included PEM. These included the Flesch-Kincaid grade level and the Flesch-Reading ease score. The DISCERN tool was used to determine quality and reliability. Results: A total of 41 online PEM were included. The average Flesch-Reading ease score for all PEM was 63.43 (SD 14.21), indicating a standard difficulty level of reading. The average reading grade level was 7.85 (SD 2.38), which is higher than the recommended reading level for PEM. The mean DISCERN score was 45.66 (SD 3.34), and 27% (11/41) of the articles had DISCERN scores of less than 39, corresponding to poor or very poor quality. Conclusions: The majority of online PEM on DFU are written above the recommended reading levels and have significant deficiencies in quality and reliability. Clinicians and patients should be aware of the shortcomings of these resources and consider the impact they may have on patients' self-management.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Impact of a diabetic foot care education program on lower limb amputation rate [J].
Al-Wahbi, Abdullah M. .
VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2010, 6 :923-934
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Simply Put: A guide for creating easy-to-understand materials
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Health literacy and patient safety: Help patients understand. Manual for clini- cians
[4]   Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence [J].
Armstrong, David G. ;
Boulton, Andrew J. M. ;
Bus, Sicco A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (24) :2367-2375
[5]   Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in Orthopaedics [J].
Badarudeen, Sameer ;
Sabharwal, Sanjeev .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (10) :2572-2580
[6]  
cmpa-acpm, 2013, Health literacy-An asset in safer care
[7]   Readability of printed sources of diet and health information [J].
Dollahite, J ;
Thompson, C ;
McNew, R .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1996, 27 (02) :123-134
[8]   Quality assessment of diabetes online patient education materials from academic institutions [J].
Dorcely, Brenda ;
Agarwal, Nitin ;
Raghuwanshi, Maya .
HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2015, 74 (05) :568-577
[9]   Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders [J].
Ferster, Ashley P. O'Connell ;
Hu, Amanda .
ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2017, 96 (03) :128-+
[10]   The impact of foot ulceration and amputation on mortality in diabetic patients. I: From ulceration to death, a systematic review [J].
Jupiter, Daniel C. ;
Thorud, Jakob C. ;
Buckley, Clifford J. ;
Shibuya, Naohiro .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2016, 13 (05) :892-903