A typology of water-energy-food nexus research

被引:0
作者
Jones-Crank, J. Leah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, 200 Univ Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
Water-energy-food nexus; Multidisciplinary; Interdisciplinary; Transdisciplinary; CHALLENGES; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; TRANSDISCIPLINARITY; STAKEHOLDERS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104131
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus was introduced as an approach to address the combined water, energy, and food security challenges of the late 2000s. As an integrated approach, the WEF nexus combines these three resources together to measure and manage the trade-offs, co-benefits, and relationships between them and to integrate collaboration and policy between their related governance sectors. However, scholars have noted that a key challenge in the literature is a lack of a clear and consistent definition of the WEF nexus. With the volume and diversity of WEF nexus publications, a single definition may no longer be sufficient. Therefore, this perspective article addresses this limitation by developing a typology of the WEF nexus to categorize the framings and definitions of WEF nexus research. This typology provides clarity both in designing future WEF nexus research projects and in categorizing existing research. It develops the typology across two categories: the level of integration within the research design (as multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or transdisciplinary integration) and the weighting of the three sectors (whether water, energy, and food are all considered equally or whether one sector is emphasized over the other two). By using these two dimensions, this article develops a typology with six categories of the WEF nexus. Scholars may use this typology to accurately and consistently describe and design WEF nexus research within the specific context of their research study.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Urban water-energy-food nexus in the kitchen and social practices of diet and cooking: implications for household sustainability [J].
Ahmed, Abubakari .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
[2]  
Albrecht T.R., 2024, Handbook on the Governance and Politics of Water Resources, P143
[3]   The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment [J].
Albrecht, Tamee R. ;
Crootof, Arica ;
Scott, Christopher A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (04)
[4]   The water-food-energy nexus: an introduction to nexus concepts and some conceptual and operational problems [J].
Allan, Tony ;
Keulertz, Martin ;
Woertz, Eckart .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 31 (03) :301-311
[5]  
Allouche J., 2015, TECHNICAL VEIL HIDDE, V8, P610
[6]   Sustainability indicators for evaluation of the Water-Energy-Food Nexus in urban agriculture [J].
Babaei, Leila ;
Niksokhan, Mohammad Hossein ;
Torabian, Ali ;
Negahban-Azar, Masoud .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) :466-480
[7]   Creating knowledge about food-water-energy nexus at a local scale: A participatory approach in Tulcea, Romania [J].
Balaican, Dragos ;
Nichersu, Iulian ;
Nichersu, Iuliana. I. ;
Pierce, Andrea ;
Wilhelmi, Olga ;
Laborgne, Pia ;
Bratfanof, Edward .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 141 :23-32
[8]   Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach [J].
Bazilian, Morgan ;
Rogner, Holger ;
Howells, Mark ;
Hermann, Sebastian ;
Arent, Douglas ;
Gielen, Doff ;
Steduto, Pasquale ;
Mueller, Alexander ;
Komor, Paul ;
Tol, Richard S. J. ;
Yumkella, Kandeh K. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (12) :7896-7906
[9]   Transdisciplinarity and the food energy and water nexus: Ecological modernization and supply chain sustainability perspectives [J].
Bergendahl, John A. ;
Sarkis, Joseph ;
Timko, Michael T. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 133 :309-319
[10]   Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergence of the water-energy-food nexus' in UK natural resource debates [J].
Cairns, Rose ;
Krzywoszynska, Anna .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 64 :164-170