Evaluation of the accuracy of digital workflow for implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prostheses using a novel micro-CT measurement technique

被引:0
作者
Fouda, Amira [1 ]
Wyatt, Chris [1 ]
McCullagh, Anthony [1 ]
Vora, Siddharth R. [1 ]
Ford, Nancy L. [2 ]
Gebril, Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Hlth Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Oral Biol & Med Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2025年
关键词
CAD-CAM; complete arch reconstruction; dental implants; dental prosthesis; digital impressions; intraoral scanners; x-ray microtomography; IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; PRECISION; MISFIT; FIT; JAW; VERIFICATION; FRAMEWORKS; SCANNERS; CASTS;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.14061
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the accuracy of fit of full-arch implant titanium frameworks fabricated from a fully digital workflow using a novel micro-CT measurement technique.Materials and MethodsA 3D-printed model with four implant analogs was fabricated. A baseline micro-CT was obtained after placing temporary cylinders on the model. Next, the printed model was scanned with an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 5), and the STL files were used to fabricate 10 titanium frameworks. Each framework was placed back on the model, and another micro-CT was taken under two conditions: single screw test (SST-CT) and final fit test (FFT-CT), and the measurements were compared to the baseline. Framework passivity was evaluated using a single-screw test (SST) and a screw-resistance test (SRT). The accuracy of the intraoral scans was assessed by superimposing the 10 scans with a laboratory scan STL to determine if the misfit was due to scanning or milling and designing errors.ResultsNone of the frameworks was deemed acceptable using SST-CT, and only three had an acceptable fit using FFT-CT. SST and SRT non-passivity rates were 60% and 80%, respectively. Superimposition analysis revealed that only two intraoral scans used for framework fabrication fell within the acceptable deviation range of 150 microns, suggesting a high tendency for scanning errors and a possible milling or designing error in two samples.ConclusionThe results show a significant level of misfit. This suggests that the full-digital workflow for full-mouth rehabilitation can present some limitations. Due to the rapid advancement in intraoral scanning, further studies are required to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[51]   A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors [J].
Revilla-Leon, Marta ;
Kois, Dean E. E. ;
Kois, John C. C. .
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 35 (01) :241-249
[52]   Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital ImpressionsAn In Vitro Study [J].
Ribeiro, Paulo ;
Herrero-Climent, Mariano ;
Diaz-Castro, Carmen ;
Rios-Santos, Jose Vicente ;
Padros, Roberto ;
Mur, Javier Gil ;
Falcao, Carlos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (08)
[53]   Misfit simulation on implant-supported prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases: Part 3: A radiographic evaluation [J].
Rutkunas, Vygandas ;
Kules, Daniel ;
Mischitz, Ingrida ;
Huber, Sandra ;
Revilla-Leon, Marta ;
Larsson, Christel ;
Janda, Martin .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (01) :222-228
[54]   Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant-supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow [J].
Rutkunas, Vygandas ;
Larsson, Christel ;
von Steyern, Per Vult ;
Mangano, Francesco ;
Gedrimiene, Agne .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (02) :237-245
[55]  
Sahin S, 2001, Implant Dent, V10, P85
[56]   Comparative study of the accuracy of an implant intraoral scanner and that of a conventional intraoral scanner for-arch fixed dental [J].
Sallorenzo, Alessandro ;
Gomez-Polo, Miguel .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (05) :1009-1016
[57]   Recommendations for Implant-Supported Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Edentulous Patients: The Oral Reconstruction Foundation Consensus Report [J].
Schwarz, Frank ;
Schaer, Alex ;
Nelson, Katja ;
Fretwurst, Tobias ;
Fluegge, Tabea ;
Ramanauskaite, Ausra ;
Trimpou, Georgina ;
Sailer, Irena ;
Karasan, Duygu ;
Fehmer, Vincent ;
Guerra, Fernando ;
Messias, Ana ;
Nicolau, Pedro ;
Chochlidakis, Konstantinos ;
Tsigarida, Alexandra ;
Kernen, Florian ;
Taylor, Thomas ;
Vazouras, Konstantinos ;
Herklotz, Insa ;
Sader, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 :S8-S20
[58]   Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An in vitro study [J].
Shaikh, Mohsin ;
Lakha, Tabrez ;
Kheur, Supriya ;
Qamri, Batul ;
Kheur, Mohit .
JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2022, 22 (04) :398-404
[59]   Digitally Designed and Milled Verification Jigs Generated from Photogrammetry Data Acquisition: A Clinical Report [J].
Sinada, Naif ;
Papaspyridakos, Panos .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (08) :651-655
[60]   Implant Impression Techniques for the Edentulous Jaw: A Summary of Three Studies [J].
Stimmelmayr, Michael ;
Beuer, Florian ;
Edelhoff, Daniel ;
Gueth, Jan-Frederik .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (02) :146-150