Comparative study of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes and partially-averaged Navier-Stokes models for cavitation flows around a hemispherical head-form body

被引:1
作者
Park, Junyoung [1 ,2 ]
Seok, Woochan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Marine Convergence Engn, Busan, South Korea
[2] HD Hyundai Heavy Ind, Hyundai Maritime Res Inst, Ulsan, South Korea
[3] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Syst Engn, Busan, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Cavitation; Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS); Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS); Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD); Hemispherical head-form body; OpenFOAM (Open-source Field Operation and Manipulation); NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; SHEDDING DYNAMICS; SIMULATION; TURBULENCE; HYDROFOIL; VALIDATION; PANS; DES;
D O I
10.1016/j.euromechflu.2025.204265
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Cavitation causes the erosion of marine propellers and induces noise and vibration within the mechanical system. In this study, the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and partially-averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) models for detecting cavitation flows around a three-dimensional (3D) hemispherical head-form body were compared. These turbulence models can accurately depict the unsteady characteristics of cavitation flows. To investigate the effect of these turbulence models on flow characteristics, we analyzed the periodic shedding of the sheet and cloud cavitation. In addition to the shape of the cavity around the body, the pressure, velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent viscosity were compared to identify the differences between the turbulent models. An open-source platform OpenFOAM was used for this analysis. The results revealed that the pressure coefficient in the PANS model was consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, the PANS model provided an accurate depiction of the development process of sheet and cloud cavitation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Simulations of cavitating flows using hybrid unstructured meshes [J].
Ahuja, V ;
Hosangadi, A ;
Arunajatesan, S .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (02) :331-340
[2]  
Brennen CE., 2005, Fundamentals of multiphase flow, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807169
[3]   Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications [J].
Celik, Ishmail B. ;
Ghia, Urmila ;
Roache, Patrick J. ;
Freitas, Christopher J. .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (07) :0780011-0780014
[4]   Numerical investigation on the cavitation collapse regime around the submerged vehicles navigating with deceleration [J].
Chen, Ying ;
Lu, Chuanjing ;
Chen, Xin ;
Cao, Jiayi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2015, 49 :153-170
[5]   Characterization of unsteady cavitating flow regimes around a hydrofoil, based on an extended Schnerr-Sauer model coupled with a nucleation model [J].
De Giorgi, M. G. ;
Fontanarosa, D. ;
Ficarella, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2019, 115 (158-180) :158-180
[6]   Numerical investigation of body and hole effects on the cavitating flow behind a disk cavitator at extremely low Cheek for cavitation numbers [J].
Erfanian, Mohammad-Reza ;
Anbarsooz, Morteza .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 62 :163-180
[7]  
Franc J.P., 2005, Fundamentals of Cavitation, V76, DOI DOI 10.1007/1-4020-2233-6
[8]   Flow Past a Backward-Facing Step: Comparison of PANS, DES and URANS Results with Experiments [J].
Frendi, Abdelkader ;
Tosh, Abhijit ;
Girimaji, Sharath .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCE & MECHANICS, 2007, 8 (01) :23-38
[9]   Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model for turbulence: A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to direct numerical simulation bridging method [J].
Girimaji, SS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2006, 73 (03) :413-421
[10]   Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horse-shoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil [J].
Ji, Bin ;
Luo, Xianwu ;
Wu, Yulin ;
Peng, Xiaoxing ;
Duan, Yunling .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2013, 51 :33-43