Prediction of mammographic breast density based on clinical breast ultrasound images using deep learning: a retrospective analysis

被引:0
作者
Bunnell, Arianna [1 ,2 ]
Valdez, Dustin [2 ]
Wolfgruber, Thomas K. [2 ]
Quon, Brandon [2 ]
Hung, Kailee [1 ]
Hernandez, Brenda Y. [2 ]
Seto, Todd B. [3 ]
Killeen, Jeffrey
Miyoshi, Marshall [4 ]
Sadowski, Peter [1 ]
Shepherd, John A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, POST Bldg 1860 East-West Rd, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Canc Ctr, 701 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[3] Queens Med Ctr, 1301 Punchbowl St, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[4] Hawaii Diag Radiol Serv St Francis, 2230 Liliha St Suite 106, Honolulu, HI 96817 USA
来源
LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-AMERICAS | 2025年 / 46卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Ultrasound; Breast cancer screening; Breast density; BI-RADS; Breast cancer risk; Artificial intelligence; Low-and middle-income countries; GLANDULAR TISSUE COMPONENT; CANCER RISK; PATTERNS; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.lana.2025.101096
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Breast density, as derived from mammographic images and defined by the Breast Imaging Reporting & Data System (BI-RADS), is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. Breast ultrasound is an alternative breast cancer screening modality, particularly useful in low-resource, rural contexts. To date, breast ultrasound has not been used to inform risk models that need breast density. The purpose of this study is to explore the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict BI-RADS breast density category from clinical breast ultrasound imaging. Methods We compared deep learning methods for predicting breast density directly from breast ultrasound imaging, as well as machine learning models from breast ultrasound image gray-level histograms alone. The use of AI-derived breast ultrasound breast density as a breast cancer risk factor was compared to clinical BI-RADS breast density. Retrospective (2009-2022) breast ultrasound data were split by individual into 70/20/10% groups for training, validation, and held-out testing for reporting results. Findings 405,120 clinical breast ultrasound images from 14,066 women (mean age 53 years, range 18-99 years) with clinical breast ultrasound exams were retrospectively selected for inclusion from three institutions: 10,393 training (302,574 images), 2593 validation (69,842), and 1074 testing (28,616). The AI model achieves AUROC 0.854 in breast density classification and statistically significantly outperforms all image statistic-based methods. In an existing clinical 5-year breast cancer risk model, breast ultrasound AI and clinical breast density predict 5-year breast cancer risk with 0.606 and 0.599 AUROC (DeLong's test p-value: 0.67), respectively. Interpretation BI-RADS breast density can be estimated from breast ultrasound imaging with high accuracy. The AI model provided superior estimates to other machine learning approaches. Furthermore, we demonstrate that age-adjusted, AI-derived breast ultrasound breast density provides similar predictive power to mammographic breast density in our population. Estimated breast density from ultrasound may be useful in performing breast cancer risk assessment in areas where mammography may not be available.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Selection of Circular Proposals in Building Projects: An MCDM Model for Lifecycle Circularity Assessments Using AHP [J].
Abadi, Mohamed ;
Moore, David R. .
BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (08)
[2]   Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework [J].
Akiba, Takuya ;
Sano, Shotaro ;
Yanase, Toshihiko ;
Ohta, Takeru ;
Koyama, Masanori .
KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, :2623-2631
[3]   Predicting mammographic density with linear ultrasound transducers [J].
Behrens, Annika ;
Fasching, Peter A. ;
Schwenke, Eva ;
Gass, Paul ;
Haeberle, Lothar ;
Heindl, Felix ;
Heusinger, Katharina ;
Lotz, Laura ;
Lubrich, Hannah ;
Preuss, Caroline ;
Schneider, Michael O. ;
Schulz-Wendtland, Ruediger ;
Stumpfe, Florian M. ;
Uder, Michael ;
Wunderle, Marius ;
Zahn, Anna L. ;
Hack, Carolin C. ;
Beckmann, Matthias W. ;
Emons, Julius .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 28 (01)
[4]   Implementing the National Dense Breast Reporting Standard, Expanding Supplemental Screening Using Current Guidelines, and the Proposed Find It Early Act [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Seitzman, Robin L. ;
Pushkin, JoAnn .
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (06) :712-723
[5]   Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666 [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Bandos, Andriy I. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (04)
[6]   Mammographic breast density and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bodewes, F. T. H. ;
van Asselt, A. A. ;
Dorrius, M. D. ;
Greuter, M. J. W. ;
de Bock, G. H. .
BREAST, 2022, 66 :62-68
[7]   Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort [J].
Brentnall, Adam R. ;
Harkness, Elaine F. ;
Astley, Susan M. ;
Donnelly, Louise S. ;
Stavrinos, Paula ;
Sampson, Sarah ;
Fox, Lynne ;
Sergeant, Jamie C. ;
Harvie, Michelle N. ;
Wilson, Mary ;
Beetles, Ursula ;
Gadde, Soujanya ;
Lim, Yit ;
Jain, Anil ;
Bundred, Sara ;
Barr, Nicola ;
Reece, Valerie ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Evans, D. Gareth R. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
[8]   BUSClean: Open-source software for breast ultrasound image pre-processing and knowledge extraction for medical AI [J].
Bunnell, Arianna ;
Hung, Kailee ;
Shepherd, John A. ;
Sadowski, Peter .
PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12)
[9]   Quantitative analysis of breast echotexture patterns in automated breast ultrasound images [J].
Chang, Ruey-Feng ;
Hou, Yu-Ling ;
Lo, Chung-Ming ;
Huang, Chiun-Sheng ;
Chen, Jeon-Hor ;
Kim, Won Hwa ;
Chang, Jung Min ;
Bae, Min Sun ;
Moon, Woo Kyung .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (08) :4566-4578
[10]   A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Calabrese, Massimo ;
Durando, Manuela ;
Gentilini, Maria Adalgisa ;
Mariscotti, Giovanna ;
Monetti, Francesco ;
Moriconi, Enrica ;
Pesce, Barbara ;
Roselli, Antonella ;
Stevanin, Carmen ;
Tapparelli, Margherita ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
BREAST, 2012, 21 (04) :503-506