Dual-View Deep Learning Approach for Predictive Business Process Monitoring

被引:0
作者
Chen, Binbin [1 ]
Zhao, Shuangyao [1 ]
Zhang, Qiang [1 ]
Tang, Chunhua [1 ]
Lin, Leilei [2 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230002, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Normal Univ, Sch Management, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dual-view; information fusion; next activity perdition; deep learning; predictive business process monitoring; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1109/TSC.2025.3562344
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Predictive business process monitoring (PBPM) is particularly valuable in dynamic business environments, and it can help organisations mitigate risks and optimise resource allocation. An interesting task in PBPM is next activity prediction (NAP), which allows the prediction of future activities that will be executed at a certain time based on ongoing business processes. Existing methods typically only utilise the order information of traces when predicting the next activity, without fully leveraging the attribute information present in the logs. Given the usefulness of these for NAP, combining them can help neural networks gain a deeper understanding of the actual business process. In this study, we propose a dual-view deep learning approach to fully extract and fuse the aforementioned two aspects of information. First, we treated traces as sequential texts and extracted the trace order information based on a long short-term memory based self-attention network. Then, we treated traces as unstructured images and captured the implicit attribute fusion information among events using a 12-layer residual network. Finally, two parts of information were fused for NAP. Experiments on 12 real-life event logs prove that the proposed approach is superior to state-of-the-art approaches, exhibiting good performance in accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1-score, and macro-Gmean.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1380
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Adamic LA., 2002, GLOTTOMETRICS, V3, P143, DOI DOI 10.1109/S0SE.2014.50
[2]   Automated Discovery of Process Models from Event Logs: Review and Benchmark [J].
Augusto, Adriano ;
Conforti, Raffaele ;
Dumas, Marlon ;
La Rosa, Marcello ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Marrella, Andrea ;
Mecella, Massimo ;
Soo, Allar .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2019, 31 (04) :686-705
[3]  
Bergstra J.S., 2011, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, DOI DOI 10.5555/2986459.2986743
[4]   COMPREHENSIBLE PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR BUSINESS PROCESSES [J].
Breuker, Dominic ;
Matzner, Martin ;
Delfmann, Patrick ;
Becker, Joerg .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2016, 40 (04) :1009-+
[5]   Learning Accurate LSTM Models of Business Processes [J].
Camargo, Manuel ;
Dumas, Marlon ;
Gonzalez-Rojas, Oscar .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2019), 2019, 11675 :286-302
[6]   Multi-task prediction method of business process based on BERT and Transfer Learning [J].
Chen, Hang ;
Fang, Xianwen ;
Fang, Huan .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2022, 254
[7]   Predictive Business Process Monitoring Framework with Hyperparameter Optimization [J].
Di Francescomarino, Chiara ;
Dumas, Marlon ;
Federici, Marco ;
Ghidini, Chiara ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Rizzi, Williams .
ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (CAISE 2016), 2016, 9694 :361-376
[8]   Activity Prediction of Business Process Instances with Inception CNN Models [J].
Di Mauro, Nicola ;
Appice, Annalisa ;
Basile, Teresa M. A. .
ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AI*IA 2019, 2019, 11946 :348-361
[9]   Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes: A Survey [J].
Eduardo Marquez-Chamorro, Alfonso ;
Resinas, Manuel ;
Ruiz-Cortes, Antonio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, 2018, 11 (06) :962-977
[10]   Predicting process behaviour using deep learning [J].
Evermann, Joerg ;
Rehse, Jana-Rebecca ;
Fettke, Peter .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2017, 100 :129-140