Outcomes of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Wang, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Xiaoxiang [1 ,2 ]
Manodoro, Stefano [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lin, Chaoqin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Matern & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Gynecol, 18 Dao Shan St, Fuzhou 350000, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Coll Clin Med Obstet & Gynecol & Pediat, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] San Paolo Hosp, ASST Santi Paolo & Carlo, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
[5] San Paolo Hosp, Dept Urogynecol, Via Antonio di Rudini 8, I-20142 Milan, Italy
关键词
Minimally invasive gynecology; Native-tissue repair; Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterosacral ligament suspension; VNOTES; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; HYSTERECTOMY; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-025-06195-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and HypothesisThis systematic review is aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-uterosacral ligament suspension (vNOTES-USLS) based on current evidence.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted for studies published up to 31 December 2024. Original studies on vNOTES-USLS were included, whereas reviews, abstracts, and publications not in the English language were excluded. No restrictions were placed on sample size or publication date.ResultsNine studies with 336 patients met the criteria, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 3 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies. Operative time ranged from 17.4 +/- 6.4 to 29.7 +/- 8.2 minutes. Hemoglobin reduction varied between 1.12 +/- 0.83 and 1.80 +/- 1.57 g/dl. Hospital stays ranged from 1.0 +/- 0.5 to 3.7 +/- 1.1 days. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.1% (7 out of 336), with bladder injury being the most common (3 cases). One patient required conversion to vaginal USLS, but no laparotomy conversions were reported. Ureteral kinking occurred in 1 case (0.3%) and was resolved intraoperatively. Postoperative complications were reported in 7.4% (25 out of 336), with urinary tract infection being the most frequent (10 cases). Over 1-37 months of follow-up, 1 patient required reoperation for anterior prolapse recurrence.ConclusionvNOTES-USLS appears to be a promising option for apical prolapse, with favorable short-term outcomes. However, small sample sizes, short follow-ups, and study design variations limit current evidence. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-ups and direct comparisons with established procedures are needed to assess long-term safety and effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic versus conventional vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for apical compartment prolapse [J].
Aharoni, Saar ;
Matanes, Emad ;
Lauterbach, Roy ;
Mor, Omer ;
Weiner, Zeev ;
Lowenstein, Lior .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 260 :203-207
[2]   Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience from a tertiary care hospital [J].
Alay, Ismail ;
Kaya, Cihan ;
Cengiz, Huseyin ;
Yildiz, Sukru ;
Aslan, Ozgur ;
Yasar, Levent ;
Ekin, Murat .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2021, 14 (03) :346-352
[3]   Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Barber, Matthew D. ;
Maher, Christopher .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (11) :1783-1790
[4]  
Benton-Bryant C, 2025, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V32, DOI [10.1016/j.jmig.2024.11.004, 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.11.004]
[5]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[6]   Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review [J].
Campagna, Giuseppe ;
Panico, Giovanni ;
Lombisani, Andrea ;
Vacca, Lorenzo ;
Caramazza, Daniela ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Ercoli, Alfredo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 277 :57-70
[7]   Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J].
Cumpston, Miranda ;
Li, Tianjing ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Chandler, Jacqueline ;
Welch, Vivian A. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Thomas, James .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10)
[8]   Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature [J].
Douligeris, Athanasios ;
Kathopoulis, Nikolaos ;
Zachariou, Eleftherios ;
Mortaki, Anastasia ;
Zacharakis, Dimitrios ;
Kypriotis, Konstantinos ;
Chatzipapas, Ioannis ;
Protopapas, Athanasios .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) :477-487
[9]   Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension in patients who had concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for subtotal uterine prolapse [J].
Ekin, Murat ;
Dura, Mustafa Cengiz ;
Yildiz, Sukru ;
Guersoy, Berk ;
Yildiz, Yagmur Yucebas ;
Dogan, Keziban ;
Kaya, Cihan .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2024, 17 (03)
[10]   The Feasibility and Safety of vNOTES Hysterectomy and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Case Series [J].
Farah, Stephanie ;
Albaini, Obey ;
Al Jardali, Marwa ;
Daccache, Aimee ;
Jallad, Karl .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 30 (05) :414-417