Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: How to Develop and Implement Safe, Ethical and Trustworthy AI Systems

被引:0
作者
Jenko, Sasa [1 ,2 ]
Papadopoulou, Elsa [3 ,4 ]
Kumar, Vikas [5 ]
Overman, Steven S. [6 ]
Krepelkova, Katarina [7 ]
Wilson, Joseph [8 ]
Dunbar, Elizabeth L. [9 ]
Spice, Carolin [10 ]
Exarchos, Themis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Jackson Sch Int Studies, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] European Commiss, SG REFORM, B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Ionian Univ, Dept Informat, Bioinformat & Human Electrophysiol Lab BiHELab, Corfu, Greece
[4] European Res Execut Agcy, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium
[5] Exactech Inc, Machine Learning, Seattle, WA 98164 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Div Rheumatol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] European Hlth & Digital Execut Agcy, B-1210 St Josse Ten Noode, Belgium
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] Univ Washington, Dept Global Hlth, Digital Initiat Grp, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[10] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
AI in healthcare; ethical AI; EU and US Regulatory Frameworks; trustworthy AI; clinical AI implementation; AI liability; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.3390/ai6060116
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into everyday life, including the complex and highly regulated healthcare sector. Given healthcare's essential role in safeguarding human life and well-being, AI deployment requires careful oversight to ensure safety, effectiveness, and ethical compliance. This paper aims to examine the current regulatory landscapes governing AI in healthcare, particularly in the European Union (EU) and the United States (USA), and to propose practical tools to support the responsible development and implementation of AI systems. Methods: The study reviews key regulatory frameworks, ethical guidelines, and expert recommendations from international bodies, professional associations, and governmental institutions in the EU and USA. Based on this analysis, the paper develops structured questionnaires tailored for AI developers and implementers to help operationalize regulatory and ethical expectations. Results: The proposed questionnaires address critical gaps in existing frameworks by providing actionable, lifecycle-oriented tools that span AI development, deployment, and clinical use. These instruments support compliance and ethical integrity while promoting transparency and accountability. Conclusions: The structured questionnaires can serve as practical tools for health technology assessments, public procurement, accreditation processes, and training initiatives. By aligning AI system design with regulatory and ethical standards, they contribute to building trustworthy, safe, and innovative AI applications in healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Navigating the EU AI Act: implications for regulated digital medical products [J].
Aboy, Mateo ;
Minssen, Timo ;
Vayena, Effy .
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01)
[2]  
Accreditation Commission for Health Care, 2021, About Accreditation
[3]  
Act A., 1996, Public Law, V104, P191
[4]   A Systematic Review of the Barriers to the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare [J].
Ahmed, Molla Imaduddin ;
Spooner, Brendan ;
Isherwood, John ;
Lane, Mark ;
Orrock, Emma ;
Dennison, Ashley .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
[5]  
AI Power Consumption and Share of Total Data Center Consumption, Worldwide in 2023 with Forecasts to 2028 in Statista and Environmental Impact of AI in Statista
[6]   Artificial Intelligence and Health Technology Assessment: Anticipating a New Level of Complexity [J].
Alami, Hassane ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Auclair, Yannick ;
de Guise, Michele ;
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Shaw, James ;
Roy, Denis ;
Fleet, Richard ;
Ahmed, Mohamed Ali Ag ;
Fortin, Jean-Paul .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (07)
[7]  
American Board of Family Medicine, 2025, ABFM Family Medicine Board Review
[8]  
American Board of Medical Specialties, 2021, What Is ABMS Board Certification?
[9]  
American Legislative Exchange Council, 2012, Product Liability Act
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Equal Credit Opportunity Act