Investigation on the Welfare of Angora Goats Using Animal and Resource-Based Indicators

被引:0
作者
Sakar, Cagri Meliksah [1 ]
Ergiden, Yasin [1 ]
Erdal, Nurgul [1 ]
Zengin, Yusuf [1 ]
Aydin, Adil Akin [1 ]
Battini, Monica [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Livestock Res & Training, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci DiSAA, Milan, Italy
关键词
Angora goat; animal welfare; animal-based; resource-based; ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL; FARMS;
D O I
10.1080/10888705.2025.2507046
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the welfare levels of Angora goats in Ankara Province, T & uuml;rkiye, using the Animal Needs Index (ANI) and Animal Welfare Indicators (AWIN) methods. The assessment was conducted on 28 farms, a total of 786 goats. By ANI score, the average was 46.8, with no significant difference based on farm size, as large (>= 600), medium (300-599), and small (<= 299) farms scored 45.6, 46.4, and 48.4 respectively. Using the AWIN Protocol, based on Body Condition Scores, 12.8% of goats were overweight and 11.1% underweight. Poor hair condition was observed in 14.1% of goats, while signs of thermal stress, abscesses, and fecal soiling were present in 1.5%, 1.1%, and 18.6% of goats, respectively; additionally, nasal discharge was detected in 21.2%, ocular discharge in 16.8%, overgrown claws in 18.2%, and udder asymmetry in 13.2% of the goats. The prevalence of dirty goats was observed in 43.6% and anemia (Famacha score 3-4-5) was found in 52.2% of goats. The study emphasizes the positive impact of smaller farm sizes on goat welfare, particularly in terms of locomotion and social interaction.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Introduction of Turkey small ruminant genetic Resources
[2]   Assessment of welfare on 24 commercial UK dairy goat farms based on direct observations [J].
Anzuino, K. ;
Bell, N. J. ;
Bazeley, K. J. ;
Nicol, C. J. .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2010, 167 (20) :774-780
[3]   Herd management and welfare assessment of dairy goat farms in Northern Cyprus by using breeding, health, reproduction, and biosecurity indicators [J].
Arsoy, Dilek .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2020, 52 (01) :71-78
[4]  
AWIN, 2015, AWIN welfare assessment protocol for goat, DOI [DOI 10.13130/AWINGOATS2015, https://doi.org/10.13130/AWINGOATS2015, 10.13130/AWINGOATS2015]
[5]  
Bartussek H., 2000, Animal Needs Index For Cattle, Sheet 5, Stockmanship, Ani35l/2000
[6]  
Bath G. F., 1996, P 7 ANN C LIV HLTH P
[7]   The Use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Dairy Goats [J].
Battini, Monica ;
Barbieri, Sara ;
Vieira, Ana ;
Can, Edna ;
Stilwell, George ;
Mattiello, Silvana .
ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (07)
[8]   Results of testing the prototype of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats in 30 intensive farms in Northern Italy [J].
Battini, Monica ;
Barbieri, Sara ;
Vieira, Ana ;
Stilwell, George ;
Mattiello, Silvana .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 15 (02) :283-293
[9]   Feasibility and validity of animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment of thermal stress in dairy goats [J].
Battini, Monica ;
Barbieri, Sara ;
Fioni, Luna ;
Mattiello, Silvana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2016, 60 (02) :289-296
[10]  
Erol H., 2017, Lalahan Hayvancilik Araștirma Enstitusu Dergisi, V57, P1