"GREAT VICTORY" IN THE "GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR" AS A SOVIET-RUSSIAN COLONIAL PROJECT

被引:0
作者
Lysenko, Oleksandr [1 ]
Pastushenko, Tetiana [1 ]
机构
[1] NAS Ukraine, Inst Hist Ukraine, Dept Mil Hist Res, Kyiv, Ukraine
来源
UKRAINSKYI ISTORYCHNYI ZHURNAL | 2025年 / 02期
关键词
Great Victory; Great Patriotic War; World War II; commemorative policy; pobedobesie; colonial discourse; Russo-Ukrainian war; UKRAINE; NATION;
D O I
10.15407/uhj2025.02.060
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
The goal is to analyze the practices of commemorating the victory over Nazism in World War II as a tool of Russia's colonial policy, which employs historical memory to legitimize its expansionist policies towards post-Soviet states, especially Ukraine. Methodology. The research is based on an interdisciplinary approach, combining concepts from historical politics, social psychology, postcolonial studies, and political science. Methods used include critical discourse analysis, comparative analysis of historical narratives, and content analysis of official commemorative practices in Ukraine and Russia. The scientific novelty. For the first time, the cult of the "Great Victory" and the myth of the "Great Patriotic War" are interpreted as components of Russia's colonial project aimed at maintaining control over the post-Soviet space through symbolic dominance and information warfare. The study highlights how the formation of "pobedobesie" (victory frenzy) became a tool for mobilizing Russian society and justifying aggression against Ukraine. The main results. The research establishes that the identity crisis in Russia at the turn of the 20th - 21st centuries led to the construction of a new historical myth, with the "Great Victory" becoming the core of collective memory and political self-affirmation. Under Putin's rule, this myth was elevated to the status of a national ideology, legitimizing both internal repressive policies and external aggression. In Ukraine, commemorative practices shifted towards demythologization of the Soviet narrative, fostering a pluralistic memory space and gradually abandoning May 9 celebrations in favor of European-style commemoration. Thus, Victory Day transformed from a tool of "integration" of the post-Soviet space into the Russian imperial matrix into a symbol of resistance to Russian neo-imperialism.
引用
收藏
页数:252
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Bassin M., 1999, Imperial Visions: Nationalist Imagination and Geographical Expansion in the Russian Far East, 1840-1865
[2]  
Blacker U, 2013, PALGRAVE STUD CULT, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137322067
[3]  
Chakrabarty Dipesh., 2000, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference
[4]  
Connerton P, 2004, Yak suspilstva pamiataiut
[5]  
Edele M., 2022, History and Memory, V34, P90
[6]  
Etkind Alexander., 2011, Internal Colonization: The Russian Imperial Experience
[7]  
Fanon F., 1961, Th e Wretched of the Earth
[8]  
Fedor J, 2017, PALG MACMIL MEMORY, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66523-8
[9]  
Fedor J., 2015, Th e Journal of Post-Soviet Politics and Society, V1, P53
[10]  
Gabowitsch M., 2016, Russian Politics and Law, V54, P1