COORDINATION RIGHTS AFTER BANK FAILURE

被引:0
作者
Hawley, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Law Sch, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
LAW; FOUNDATIONS; RESOLUTION; ANTITRUST; COSTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In spring 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) resolved three of the four largest bank failures in U.S. history. When the FDIC resolves failed banks, this Note argues, it (unselfconsciously) allocates coordination rights-that is, the right to legally permitted economic coordination. Specifically, by reflexively merging failed banks into larger banks, the FDIC adopts antitrust law's preference for hierarchical firm-based coordination. Recent scholarship challenges that pattern in antitrust law. In banking, it is especially problematic. Yet even according to antitrust and bank resolution orthodoxy, the FDIC's allocation of coordination rights is incoherent as such. This Note proposes instead that the FDIC self-consciously disperse coordination rights after banks fail. The Agency can do so without new law, turning failed banks into quasi-worker cooperatives.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 656
页数:58
相关论文
共 183 条
[1]  
Adler Barry E., 2020, Baird and Jackson's Bankruptcy: Cases, Problems, and Materials, V32
[2]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[3]  
Allen Jason, 2023, Banking Fragility and Resolution Costs, P14
[4]  
Anand Nupur, 2023, ReutersMay 2,
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Citibank" is the bank subsidiary of the bank holding company "Citigroup
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Letter from Debbie Matz, Chair, NCUA, to All Federal Credit Unions
[7]  
[Anonymous], Living Wills (or Resolution Plans)
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, WHAT WE DO
[9]  
[Anonymous], Policy Tools
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Copperweld Corp. v. Indep. Tube Corp.