Open innovation for circular and sustainable business models: case evidence from the bioeconomy sector

被引:0
作者
Dorrego-Viera, Juan I. [1 ,2 ]
Urbinati, Andrea [2 ]
Hansen, Erik G. [1 ]
Lazzarotti, Valentina [2 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Integrated Qual Design IQD, Linz, Austria
[2] LIUC Univ Cattaneo, Sch Ind Engn, Varese, Italy
来源
INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT | 2025年
关键词
Open Innovation; circular economy; bioeconomy; digital age; archetypes; sustainable business; SUPPLY CHAINS; ECONOMY; OPPORTUNITIES; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; PERSPECTIVES; ERA;
D O I
10.1080/14479338.2025.2506731
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study explores the integration of Open Innovation (OI) models with archetypes of sustainable business in Forest-based Bioeconomy (FBB) companies in the digital age. Utilising a multiple case study methodology, four FBB companies were examined to understand their strategic orientations and sustainability practices. Case studies provide detailed insights into processes and interactions within specific contexts, making them suitable for examining emerging phenomena like the Circular Economy (CE). Although OI, CE, and sustainability have been individually studied, little empirical research explores their intersection in the FBB. Existing literature often focuses on theoretical foundations or isolated applications, neglecting how OI supports circular and sustainable business models in the FBB. Additionally, the challenges and opportunities for FBB companies in the Global South remain largely unexamined, despite their importance in global sustainability transitions. Therefore, this research addresses a significant gap by exploring how companies operating in the forest-based bioeconomy sector exploit OI models to enhance circular and sustainable business models in the digital age. The findings reveal that sustainability approaches are dynamic and overlapping strategies rather than fixed archetypes. The study highlights how OI models facilitate the use of both external and internal knowledge at various stages of innovation, demonstrating that the choice of sustainability archetypes both influences and is influenced by companies' OI models. These insights are valuable for scholars, managers, and policymakers aiming to promote sustainable economic development and environmental stewardship.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 89 条
[41]  
Gustafsson J., 2017, Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study
[42]  
Hansen D.E.G., 2013, Enciclopedia de Responsabilidade Social Corporativa, P2407, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_552
[43]  
Hansen E.G., 2012, Journal of Small Businesses and Entrepreneurship, V25, P451, DOI DOI 10.1080/08276331.2012.10593584
[44]  
Hansen E. G., 2009, 20 ISPIM C VIENN AUS
[45]   Orchestrating cradle-to-cradle innovation across the value chain: Overcoming barriers through innovation communities, collaboration mechanisms, and intermediation [J].
Hansen, Erik G. ;
Schmitt, Julia C. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 25 (03) :627-647
[46]   Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire [J].
Hansen, Erik G. ;
Revellio, Ferdinand .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (06) :1250-1273
[47]  
Hetemki L., 2015, GERM FOR ASS DTSCH F, DOI [https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3775.9844, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.3775.9844]
[48]   Developing and implementing circular economy business models in service-oriented technology companies [J].
Heyes, Graeme ;
Sharmina, Maria ;
Mendoza, Joan Manuel F. ;
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro ;
Azapagic, Adisa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 :621-632
[49]  
International Energy Agency (IEA), 2023, World Energy Outlook 2023, DOI DOI 10.1787/827374A6-EN
[50]   Environmental policy integration in a newly established natural resource-based sector: the role of advocacy coalitions and contrasting conceptions of sustainability [J].
Kefeli, Daniel ;
Siegel, Karen M. ;
Pittaluga, Lucia ;
Dietz, Thomas .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2023, 56 (01) :69-93