Comparison of the cadmium and lead removal from three soils by electrokinetic remediation

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Mei [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Chengdong [3 ]
Wang, Xinfu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Natl Adm Coal Geol, Jiangsu Design Inst Geol Mineral Resources, Testing Ctr, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] China Coal Geol Bur, Key Lab Coal Measures & Mineral Resources, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Min & Technol, Xu Hai Coll, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
electrokinetic remediation; lead-cadmium; three soils; CU; EXTRACTION; METALS; PH;
D O I
10.17221/140/2024-SWR
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
This study investigated, for the first time, the efficacy of citric acid (CA) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as electrolytes in electrokinetic remediation (EKR) for removing lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) from three distinct soils (Anthrosols soil, AT; Acrisols soil, AC; and Chernozems soil, CH). Under a voltage gradient of 2 V/cm and a remediation duration of 4 days, EDTA proved most effective for Anthrosols, achieving removal rates of 17.8% for Cd and 12.8% for Pb-lower than those observed for Acrisols and Chernozems, likely due to AT's high pH background. These results suggest that combining EKR with other remediation techniques could enhance efficiency for such soils. For Acrisols soil, extending the remediation time to 10 days significantly improved metal removal: Cd removal reached 91.1% with CA, while Pb removal attained 62.7% with EDTA. Chernozems soil exhibited higher sensitivity to EKR, with pronounced focusing phenomena. In CH1, Cd removal in anode-proximal (S1) zone reached 99%, but accumulation in the cathode-adjacent (S4 and S5) reduced the average removal rate to 22%, indicating the potential for improvement through cathodic control. Similarly, in CH2, Pb removal in S5 achieved 84.8%, while focusing in S1 suggested the need for anodic optimisation. These findings highlight the influence of soil properties and operational parameters on EKR efficiency, providing insights for tailored remediation strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 205
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PRINCIPLES OF ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION [J].
ACAR, YB ;
ALSHAWABKEH, AN .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (13) :2638-+
[2]  
Appel C, 2002, J ENVIRON QUAL, V31, P581, DOI 10.2134/jeq2002.0581
[3]   Extraction of metals from a contaminated sandy soil using citric acid [J].
Bassi, R ;
Prasher, SO ;
Simpson, BK .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2000, 19 (04) :275-282
[4]   Scale -up of electrokinetic process for dredged sediments remediation [J].
Benamar, A. ;
Ammami, M. T. ;
Song, Y. ;
Portet-Koltalo, F. .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2020, 352
[5]   Enhancement Of Electro-Osmotic Flow During The Electrokinetic Treatment Of A Contaminated Soil [J].
Cameselle, Claudio .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 181 :31-38
[6]   Effect of electroosmosis flow and electrolyte circulation on electrokinetic remediation of Pb-contaminated kaolin [J].
Chen, Jingyan ;
Zhuang, Yan-feng ;
Liu, Zhitao .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2025, 55 (01) :259-272
[7]   A new method for remedial treatment of contaminated clayey soils by electrokinetics coupled with permeable reactive barriers [J].
Chung, Ha Ik ;
Lee, MyungHo .
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 52 (10) :3427-3431
[8]   Effects of time, soil organic matter, and iron oxides on the relative retention and redistribution of lead, cadmium, and copper on soils [J].
Diagboya, Paul N. ;
Olu-Owolabi, Bamidele I. ;
Adebowale, Kayode O. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (13) :10331-10339
[9]   Distribution of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Soil Samples in China: A Graphical Review [J].
Duan, Qiannan ;
Lee, Jianchao ;
Liu, Yansong ;
Chen, Han ;
Hu, Huanyu .
BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 97 (03) :303-309
[10]   Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics [J].
Gent, DB ;
Bricka, RM ;
Alshawabkeh, AN ;
Larson, SL ;
Fabian, G ;
Granade, S .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2004, 110 (1-3) :53-62