Cybervetting Best Practices: An Integrative Framework for Developing, Validating, and Implementing Social Media Assessment for Personnel Selection

被引:0
作者
Hoover, Anna N. [1 ]
Rupp, Deborah E. [1 ]
Mccauley, Renee [1 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
Social media; Social media assessment; Cybervetting; Selection; Personnel selection; NETWORKING WEB SITES; JOB ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; MISSING INFORMATION; PERSONALITY; WORK; ORGANIZATION; APPLICANTS; DECISIONS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10672-025-09538-4
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The prevalence of organizations' use of applicants' social media profiles for selection (i.e., cybervetting) warrants further consideration of social media assessment best practices. Using a technology-as-designed framework (Landers & Marin, 2021), we present two features of social media platforms, namely a level of structure and degree of professional content focus, that guide whether a social media platform presents a viable option for use in a social media assessment. Consequently, we suggest LinkedIn as platform ripe for current use in social media assessment due to its high degree of structure and professional focus. Next, we review knowledge, skills, ability, and other characteristics (KSAOs) previously evaluated for use in social media assessment and propose KSAOs that future research should evaluate. Furthermore, we detail the steps organizations should take to develop, implement, and validate social media assessment to ensure the validity, legal defensibility, and fairness of the selection method. Finally, future research directions are offered.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 139 条
[41]   Using available signals on LinkedIn for personality assessment [J].
Fernandez, Sebastien ;
Stocklin, Marie ;
Terrier, Lohyd ;
Kim, Sowon .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2021, 93
[42]   THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE [J].
FLANAGAN, JC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1954, 51 (04) :327-358
[43]   The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection [J].
Geiger, Mattis ;
Olderbak, Sally ;
Sauter, Ramona ;
Wilhelm, Oliver .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
[44]  
Griffith R.L., 2011, New perspectives on faking in personality assessments, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195387476.001.0001
[45]   Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis [J].
Grove, WM ;
Zald, DH ;
Lebow, BS ;
Snitz, BE ;
Nelson, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2000, 12 (01) :19-30
[46]   Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy [J].
Grove, WM ;
Meehl, PE .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 1996, 2 (02) :293-323
[47]   Outcomes of work-life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures [J].
Haar, Jarrod M. ;
Russo, Marcello ;
Sune, Albert ;
Ollier-Malaterre, Ariane .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 85 (03) :361-373
[48]   Structuring social media assessments in employee selection [J].
Hartwell, Christopher J. ;
Harrison, Jake T. ;
Chauhan, Rahul S. ;
Levashina, Julia ;
Campion, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 30 (03) :330-343
[49]   Getting social in selection: How social networking website content is perceived and used in hiring [J].
Hartwell, Christopher J. ;
Campion, Michael A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 28 (01) :1-16
[50]   MISSING INFORMATION IN SELECTION - AN APPLICATION OF THE EINHORN-HOGARTH AMBIGUITY MODEL [J].
HIGHHOUSE, S ;
HAUSE, EL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 80 (01) :86-93