The role of large language models in the peer-review process: opportunities and challenges for medical journal reviewers and editors

被引:0
作者
Lee, Jisoo [1 ]
Lee, Jieun [2 ]
Yoo, Jeong-Ju [2 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Bucheon Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Bucheon, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Bucheon Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Bucheon, South Korea
关键词
Peer review; Large language models; Generative artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; Republic of Korea; CHATGPT;
D O I
10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The peer reviewprocess ensures the integrity of scientific research. This is particularly important in the medical field, where research findings directly impact patient care. However, the rapid growth of publications has strained reviewers, causing delays and potential declines in quality. Generative artificial intelligence, especially large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, may assist researchers with efficient, high-quality reviews. This review explores the integration of LLMs into peer review, highlighting their strengths in linguistic tasks and challenges in assessing scientific validity, particularly in clinical medicine. Key points for integration include initial screening, reviewer matching, feedback support, and language review. However, implementing LLMs for these purposes will necessitate addressing biases, privacy concerns, and data confidentiality. We recommend using LLMs as complementary tools under clear guidelines to support, not replace, human expertise in maintaining rigorous peer review standards.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe? [J].
Altmae, Signe ;
Sola-Leyva, Alberto ;
Salumets, Andres .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2023, 47 (01) :3-9
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Navigating the Peer Review Landscape
[3]  
Biswas S, 2023, YALE J BIOL MED, V96, P415, DOI 10.59249/SKDH9286
[4]  
D'Arcy M, 2024, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2401.04259
[5]   Potential of Large Language Models in Health Care: Delphi Study [J].
Denecke, Kerstin ;
May, Richard ;
Romero, Octavio Rivera .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
[6]   Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain [J].
Dennstadt, Fabio ;
Zink, Johannes ;
Putora, Paul Martin ;
Hastings, Janna ;
Cihoric, Nikola .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
[7]   Enhancing peer review efficiency: A mixed-methods analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted reviewer selection across academic disciplines [J].
Farber, Shai .
LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2024, 37 (04)
[8]   Publishers' and journals' instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis [J].
Ganjavi, Conner ;
Eppler, Michael B. ;
Pekcan, Asli ;
Biedermann, Brett ;
Abreu, Andre ;
Collins, Gary S. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
[9]   The strain on scientific publishing [J].
Hanson, Mark A. ;
Barreiro, Pablo Gomez ;
Crosetto, Paolo ;
Brockington, Dan .
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2024, 5 (04) :823-843
[10]  
Hossain E, 2025, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2402.15589, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2402.15589]