Exploring learning approaches and self-efficacy among design students in Taiwan

被引:0
作者
Lun, Sheng [1 ]
Ho, Hsin Ning Jessie [2 ,3 ]
Shih, Meilun [4 ]
Perng, Yeng-Horng [1 ]
Tsaih, Lucky [1 ]
Liang, Jyh-Chong [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Architecture, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Program Learning Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Inst Res Excellence Learning Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Ctr Gen Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Design education; Approaches to learning design; Self-efficacy; Learning strategy; Product design; PROCESS QUESTIONNAIRE; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; REVISED; 2-FACTOR; PLS-SEM; STUDIO; ACHIEVEMENT; CONCEPTIONS; ENVIRONMENT; MOTIVATION; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1007/s10798-025-10004-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Extensive research has highlighted the significant impact of students' approaches to learning and self-efficacy on academic achievement. It has been suggested that deep learning approaches, high self-efficacy, and strong academic performance are crucial for developing undergraduates' intentions to engage in sustainable lifelong learning after graduation. However, the interrelationships between students' approaches to learning and self-efficacy within the context of design education remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by investigating how students' approaches to learning design are related to and predict their learning design self-efficacy. Two validated questionnaires were developed to assess these constructs: Approaches to Learning Design (ALD) and Self-Efficacy in Learning Design (SELD). The study involved 296 university students majoring in design. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) confirmed the validity and reliability of both questionnaires, identifying eight ALD and three SELD subscales. Additionally, partial least squares structural equation (PLS-SEM) modeling demonstrated that students' deep learning approaches strongly predict their learning design self-efficacy, while surface learning approaches, such as Fear of failure, negatively predict self-efficacy. This study offers valuable insights into the relationship between students' approaches to learning and self-efficacy in design education, with important implications for enhancing classroom interactions and assessment practices.
引用
收藏
页码:1717 / 1740
页数:24
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Adane T., 2022, FRONT EDUC, V7, P965573, DOI [10.3389/feduc.2022.965573, DOI 10.3389/FEDUC.2022.965573]
[2]  
Akhter S., 2022, CENT EUR MANAG J, V30, P2154, DOI DOI 10.57030/23364890.CEMJ.30.4.223
[3]  
Ankiewicz P. J., 2018, HUMAN CENTERED DESIG
[4]   The interplay of learning approaches and self-efficacy in secondary school students' academic achievement in science [J].
Ardura, Diego ;
Galan, Arturo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 41 (13) :1723-1743
[5]   Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. .
PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 1 (02) :76-85
[6]   Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness [J].
Baeten, Marlies ;
Kyndt, Eva ;
Struyven, Katrien ;
Dochy, Filip .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2010, 5 (03) :243-260
[7]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, p74 94, DOI [10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327]
[8]  
Bailey S., 2002, Art, Design Communication in Higher Education, V1, P81, DOI DOI 10.1386/ADCH.1.2.81
[9]   PERCEIVED SELF-EFFICACY IN COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENT AND FUNCTIONING [J].
BANDURA, A .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 28 (02) :117-148
[10]   REGULATION OF COGNITIVE-PROCESSES THROUGH PERCEIVED SELF-EFFICACY [J].
BANDURA, A .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 25 (05) :729-735