Shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction over a flexible panel

被引:0
作者
Laguarda, L. [1 ]
Hickel, S. [1 ]
Schrijer, F. F. J. [1 ]
van Oudheusden, B. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Flow Phys & Technol, Aerodynam Grp, Fac Aerosp Engn, NL-2629HS Delft, Netherlands
来源
AIAA AVIATION 2023 FORUM | 2023年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Wall-resolved large-eddy simulations (LES) are carried out to investigate the aeroelastic coupling between a Mach 2 : 0 impinging shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction (STBLI) and a flexible thin-panel. After the initial transient, the panel exhibits self-sustained oscillatory behavior with varying oscillation amplitude, confirming the strong and complex dynamic coupling over a broad frequency range. The first three bending modes of the panel oscillation are found to contribute most to the unsteady panel response. The observed modal frequencies are in close agreement with natural frequencies of the pre-stressed panel, which differ significantly from the natural frequencies of the unloaded flat panel. This highlights the importance of the mean panel deformation and the corresponding stiffening in the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) dynamics. Mean-flow shows an enlarged reverse-flow region compared to a flat rigid-wall STBLI at the same flow conditions. The separation shock is also located further upstream in the coupled case, and wall-pressure fluctuations have a higher peak at the separation-shock foot. Spectral analysis of wall-pressure, separation-shock location and bubble-volume signals indicates that the STBLI flow resonates with the panel oscillation, primarily at the first bending frequency. This is further confirmed by sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition of the flow and displacement data, which identifies this frequency as the most dominant and successfully isolates the associated FSI dynamics. Based on present results, it is clear that dynamic FSI involving STBLI and flexible panels accentuates the undesirable features of STBLI.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   THERMOACOUSTIC LOADS AND FATIGUE OF HYPERSONIC VEHICLE SKIN PANELS [J].
BLEVINS, RD ;
HOLEHOUSE, I ;
WENTZ, KR .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1993, 30 (06) :971-978
[2]   Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions [J].
Clemens, Noel T. ;
Narayanaswamy, Venkateswaran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 :469-492
[3]   Characterization of shock-induced panel flutter with simultaneous use of DIC and PIV [J].
D'Aguanno, A. ;
Allerhand, P. Quesada ;
Schrijer, F. F. J. ;
van Oudheusden, B. W. .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2023, 64 (01)
[4]  
Delery J., 1986, AGARD-AG Tech. Rep. 280
[5]  
Délery J, 2009, SHOCK WAVES, V19, P453, DOI 10.1007/s00193-009-0220-z
[6]   A critique of mode acceleration and modal truncation augmentation methods for modal response analysis [J].
Dickens, JM ;
Nakagawa, JM ;
Wittbrodt, MJ .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1997, 62 (06) :985-998
[7]   Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: What next? [J].
Dolling, DS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2001, 39 (08) :1517-1531
[8]   Modeling of fluid-structure interaction [J].
Dowell, EH ;
Hall, KC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2001, 33 :445-490
[9]   Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer [J].
Dupont, P. ;
Haddad, C. ;
Debieve, J. F. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2006, 559 :255-277
[10]  
Eason T.G., 2013, 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, P1747