Sustainability Assessment: A Complex Many-Objective Multi-Agent Multidisciplinary Problem

被引:2
作者
Bataleblul, Ali Asghar [1 ]
Rauch, Erwin [1 ]
Cochran, David S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Engn, 1 Ind Engn & Automat IEA, Bolzano, Italy
[2] Purdue Univ Ft Wayne, Ctr Excellence Syst Engn, Ft Wayne, IN 46805 USA
来源
LATEST ADVANCEMENTS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 2, ISIEA 2024 | 2024年 / 1125卷
关键词
European Sustainability Report Standards (ESRS); SME; 5.0; System of Systems; Many-Objective Multi-Agent Systems; Multidisciplinary Optimization; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-70465-9_21
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
With the implementation of sustainability laws by the European Union such as the European Sustainability Report Standards (ESRS), companies are forced to assess sustainability targets, impacts, and risks through sustainability reports. Identifying the current situation toward sustainability goals is one of the challenges that companies face. The ESRS standards coupled with the focus on addressing the three pillars of sustainability concurrently serve as compelling evidence that within the System of Systems (SoS) perspective, may be defined as a complex many-objective multi-agent multidisciplinary problem. Complexity arises from the interaction and dependency between different factors and disciplines not only in the higher level of the system design but also within solutions in the lower layers. Furthermore, multiple conflicting human-centric objectives make sustainability assessment a challenging SoS problem. This paper presents a pragmatic analysis of the current situation of organizations and future milestones in the journey to sustainability. The essential steps to achieve a targeted sustainability assessment are presented to address decision-making in the presence of conflicting objectives. A new formulation for sustainability assessment is proposed to have a more practical and feasible solution based on a company's sustainability readiness levels. This formulation shows that even for the same companies with the same functionality the appropriate scenario toward sustainability realization could be different according to their maturity relative to sustainability readiness levels.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A literature review on circular economy adoption in the manufacturing sector [J].
Acerbi, Federica ;
Taisch, Marco .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
[3]  
Aruldoss M., 2013, AM J INFORM SYSTEMS, V1, P31, DOI [10.12691/ajis-1-1-5, DOI 10.12691/AJIS-1-1-5]
[4]   Optimization Approaches for Multiple Conflicting Objectives in Sustainable Green Supply Chain Management [J].
Asha, Labiba Noshin ;
Dey, Arup ;
Yodo, Nita ;
Aragon, Lucy G. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
[5]  
Bataleblu A.A., 2024, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, V849
[6]  
Bataleblu AA, 2019, Bridge Optimization-Inspection and Condition Monitoring
[7]   Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research [J].
Berrang-Ford, Lea ;
Pearce, Tristan ;
Ford, James D. .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2015, 15 (05) :755-769
[8]   An integrated sustainability assessment framework: a case of turning process [J].
Bhanot, Neeraj ;
Rao, P. Venkateswara ;
Deshmukh, S. G. .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (05) :1475-1513
[9]  
Brockhoff D., 2023, NCS, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-25263-1_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-25263-1_1]
[10]   CLIMATIC CHANGE - ARE WE ON BRINK OF A PRONOUNCED GLOBAL WARMING [J].
BROECKER, WS .
SCIENCE, 1975, 189 (4201) :460-463