Quantity or quality? Comparing social media data sampling strategies for government crisis communication research

被引:1
作者
Yu, Jingyuan [1 ]
Domahidi, Emese [1 ]
Benmaarouf, Khaoula [2 ]
Steinmetz, Nadine [3 ]
机构
[1] Ilmenau Univ Technol, Dept Econ Sci & Media, Ilmenau, Germany
[2] Univ Appl Sci Ruhr West, Inst Energy Syst & Energy Management, Mulheim, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Erfurt, Data Engn Data Sci, Erfurt, Germany
关键词
Computational social science; Inductive sampling; Deductive sampling; Social media; Government crisis communication; DATA-COLLECTION; CHALLENGES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105531
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Social media platforms are popular data sources for communication research, with X (formerly Twitter) being the most commonly used. However, strategies for high-quality social media data collection that form the cornerstone of rigorous research are rarely discussed or evaluated. In this paper, we use a case study of government crisis communication during Covid-19 in Germany and Italy to compare deductive and inductive sampling strategies on X in two different timeframes. We used different metrics (Jaccard index, precision, and recall) and different comparisons (relevant users and content, top users and terms, and tweeting frequency over time) to analyze which sampling strategy would provide high-quality data for research. Our results revealed that the deductive sampling strategy outperformed the inductive strategy in all the studied cases, this emphasizes the importance of data quality over quick access or the size of the data set. Further implications for comparative and computational research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Abuín-Penas J, 2022, REV COMUN SALUD, V12, P59, DOI [10.35669/rcys.2022.12.e303, 10.35669/rcys.2022.12.e303, DOI 10.35669/RCYS.2022.12.E303, DOI 10.35669/RCYS]
[2]  
Aires Jonker Richard Adolph., 2022, 2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), P332, DOI DOI 10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068592
[3]   Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: metrics for tweeting activities [J].
Bruns, Axel ;
Stieglitz, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 16 (02) :91-108
[4]  
Chen Emily, 2020, JMIR Public Health Surveill, V6, pe19273, DOI [10.2196/19273, 10.2196/19273]
[5]   COVID-19 in the Twitterverse, from epidemic to pandemic: information-sharing behavior and Twitter as an information carrier [J].
Chong, Miyoung ;
Park, Han Woo .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (08) :6479-6503
[6]   Tweeting after an earthquake: user localization and communication patterns during the 2012 Emilia seismic sequence [J].
Comunello, Francesca ;
Parisi, Lorenza ;
Lauciani, Valentino ;
Magnoni, Federica ;
Casarotti, Emanuele .
ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 59 (05)
[7]  
Curtice J., 2004, The Social Science Encyclopedia, Vthird
[8]   Toward a typology of government social media communication: Democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation [J].
DePaula, Nic ;
Dincelli, Ersin ;
Harrison, Teresa M. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 35 (01) :98-108
[9]  
Domahidi E, 2019, INT J COMMUN-US, V13, P3876
[10]   The Spread of COVID-19 Crisis Communication by German Public Authorities and Experts on Twitter: Quantitative Content Analysis [J].
Drescher, Larissa S. ;
Roosen, Jutta ;
Aue, Katja ;
Dressel, Kerstin ;
Schaer, Wiebke ;
Goetz, Anne .
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (12)