A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SAUDI ARABIA AND THE UNITED STATES LAW: INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW

被引：0

作者：

Almalki, Adnan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Northern Border Univ, Dept Law, Coll Business Adm, Ar Ar, Saudi Arabia

来源：

JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCES | 2025年 / 45卷 / 02期

关键词：

Saudi Commercial Arbitration law; Saudi Vision 2030; New York Convention; Federal Arbitration Act (FAA); American Arbitration Association (AAA);

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This article compares the legal systems and methodologies used in international commercial arbitration in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United States of America. This paper examines how arbitration has evolved in each state, the main arbitral organizations, the recognition of foreign arbitral awards, and the mechanism of arbitration between the two systems. It shows that although Saudi Arabia and the United States of America have recently developed their arbitration laws as part of the modernization process and meeting international standards, Saudi law influences Islamic Sharia provisions in its legal system, making it distinct and different from other legislations.

引用

页数：532

共 22 条

[1]

AAA Rules, 2021, Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures

[2]

adruk, US

[3]

Al-Fadhel F. M., 2010, Arab Law Quarterly, V24, P343, DOI [10.1163/157302510X511963, DOI 10.1163/157302510X511963]

[4]

Alattas A., 2020, Journal of International Arbitration, V37, P653, DOI [10.54648/joia2020053, DOI 10.54648/JOIA2020053]

[5]

Almuqati M, 2021, AD ALTA-INTERDISCIP, V11, P192

[6]

American Arbitration Association, 2010, Handbook on commercial arbitration

[7]

[Anonymous], 2014, BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina

[8]

[Anonymous], 2012, ESAB Group, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. PLC

[9]

[Anonymous], 2018, Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis

[10]

Baamir A. Y., 2019, Arbitration Law of Saudi Arabia

← 1 2 3 →