Endoscopic Versus Open In situ Decompression of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

被引:0
作者
Alghamdi, Abdulaziz M. [1 ,2 ]
Alkulli, Osama A. [1 ,2 ]
Faidah, Dania E. [1 ,2 ]
Alqazenli, Mohamed K. [1 ,2 ]
Fathi, Abdulaziz B. [1 ,2 ]
Allarakia, Yousof F. [1 ,2 ]
Alghamdi, Arwa [1 ,2 ]
Baaqeel, Rasha [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Abdul Aziz Med City, Dept Surg, Sect Plast Surg, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
cubital tunnel syndrome; peripheral nerve entrapment; surgical management; endoscopic in situ decompression; open-in situ decompression; ULNAR NERVE; MANAGEMENT; RELEASE;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000004248
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionCubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. Several surgical approaches are available for a definitive treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively assess and compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic in situ decompression (EISD) and open in situ decompression for CuTS.MethodsA systematic search was conducted using online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane) on the 14th of April 2024. All human RCTs and observational studies in English were included in this review.ResultsEleven studies, involving 686 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Pairwise meta-analyses showed that EISD had significantly increased surgery time [MD = 9.32 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.54, 15.11), P = 0.002], higher risk of postoperative hematoma [RR = 4.44, 95% CI (1.30, 15.20), P = 0.02], higher risk of postoperative surgical-site pain [RR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.09, 2.05), P = 0.01], lower risk of postoperative elbow numbness [RR = 0.06, 95% CI (0.01, 0.48), P = 0.007], and better postoperative grip and pinch strength [MD = 6.29, 95% CI (1.35, 11.24), P = 0.01]. In addition, it trended insignificantly toward lower rates of chronic painful scarring recurrence rates. Other measured variables did not show significant differences between the 2 surgical techniques, including the functional outcomes assessed by Bishop's score, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score, and neurophysiologic data, in addition to the postoperative infection rate, subluxation of the ulnar nerve, and reoperation rates.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrated that both surgical techniques were effective in treating CuTS. Although it was inferior in some of the measured short-term outcomes, EISD showed better results in some of the long-term measured outcomes with questionable clinical significance. The choice of the surgical approach should be tailored for each case to optimize the quality of care and overall outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 576
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials [J].
Abourisha, Eslam ;
Srinivasan, Ananth S. ;
Barakat, Ahmed ;
Chong, Han Hong ;
Singh, Harvinder P. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 53 :41-48
[2]  
Aldekhayel Salah, 2016, Hand (N Y), V11, P36, DOI 10.1177/1558944715616097
[3]   A Comprehensive Review of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome [J].
Anderson, Danyon ;
Woods, Bison ;
Abubakar, Tunde ;
Koontz, Colby ;
Li, Nathan ;
Hasoon, Jamal ;
Viswanath, Omar ;
Kaye, Alan D. ;
Urits, Ivan .
ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2022, 14 (03)
[4]   Cubital tunnel syndrome: Comparative results of a multicenter study of 4 surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 92 months [J].
Bacle, G. ;
Marteau, E. ;
Freslon, M. ;
Desmoineaux, P. ;
St-Cast, Y. ;
Lancigu, R. ;
Kerjean, Y. ;
Vernet, E. ;
Fournier, J. ;
Corcia, P. ;
Le Nen, D. ;
Rabarin, F. ;
Laulan, J. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (04) :S205-S208
[5]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[6]   Cubital tunnel syndrome: a comparison of an endoscopic technique with a minimal invasive open technique [J].
Bolster, M. A. J. ;
Zophel, O. T. ;
van den Heuvel, E. R. ;
Ruettermann, M. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (06) :621-625
[7]   The Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome [J].
Boone, Sean ;
Gelberman, Richard H. ;
Calfee, Ryan P. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 40 (09) :1897-1904
[8]   Endoscopic versus Open In Situ Cubital Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of 655 Patients [J].
Buchanan, Patrick J. ;
Chieng, Lee O. ;
Hubbard, Zachary S. ;
Law, Tsun Y. ;
Chim, Harvey .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (03) :679-684
[9]   A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing open versus endoscopic in situ decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome [J].
Byvaltsev, Vadim A. ;
Stepanov, Ivan A. ;
Kerimbayev, Talgat T. .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 2020, 120 (01) :1-8
[10]   The Impact of Preoperative Patient Education on Postoperative Pain, Opioid Use, and Psychological Outcomes: A Narrative Review [J].
Darville-Beneby, Rasheeda ;
Lomanowska, Anna M. ;
Yu, Hai Chuan ;
Jobin, Parker ;
Rosenbloom, Brittany N. ;
Gabriel, Gretchen ;
Daudt, Helena ;
Negraeff, Michael ;
Di Renna, Tania ;
Hudspith, Maria ;
Clarke, Hance .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LA DOULEUR, 2023, 7 (02)