Evaluation of Patient Radiation Dose in Cardiovascular Interventional Procedures Using Monte Carlo Simulation

被引:0
作者
Song, Tae-Ho [1 ]
Lee, Ki-Yoon [2 ]
Kim, Jang-Oh [3 ]
Gil, Jong-Won [4 ]
Jung, Kyung-Hwan [2 ]
Baek, Cheol-Ha [3 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Human Hlth Convergence, Chunchon, South Korea
[2] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Med Hlth Sci, Chunchon, South Korea
[3] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Radiol Sci, Chunchon, South Korea
[4] Korea Dis Control & Prevent Agcy, Bur Healthcare Safety & Immunizat, Div Med Radiat, Cheongju, South Korea
关键词
diagnostic reference levels; cardiovascular interventional procedures; monte carlo simulation; voxel phantom; electromagnetic radiation; OPERATION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.4283/JMAG.2024.29.4.565
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has established diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), which set benchmarks for limiting electromagnetic radiation doses across various procedures. This study reviewed DRLs based on dose report data for cardiovascular interventional procedures and analyzed patient electromagnetic radiation doses using Monte Carlo simulations and the High-Definition Reference Korean model, which is utilized as the voxel phantom. The procedures examined include coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The diagnostic X-ray energy spectrum was generated using the SRS-78 program. Based on dose reports, the irradiation field was set to 13 x 13 cm(2), with tube voltages of 80 kVp, 100 kVp, and 120 kVp and exposure times of 243 seconds, 1043 seconds, and 1423 seconds, respectively. The source-to-image and source-to-skin distances were set to 120 cm and 84 cm, respectively. The NDD(K) method, an indirect dose calculation technique, was used to perform dose calculations and estimate absorbed doses across various organs. Subsequently, effective doses were calculated in accordance with the recommendations set in ICRP 60 and ICRP 103. The effective doses for CAG at 80 kVp and 100 kVp were found to be 1.47 mSv and 3.34 mSv, respectively. In PCI, the effective doses at 80 kVp, 100 kVp, and 120 kVp were 14.70 mSv, 9.52 mSv, and 16.00 mSv, respectively. For PTCA, the effective doses at 80 kVp, 100 kVp, and 120 kVp were observed to be 9.95 mSv, 24.16 mSv, and 32.83 mSv, respectively. Following the guidelines in ICRP 60 and ICRP 103, the conversion factors for effective dose ranged from 0.202 mSv/Gy.cm(2) to 0.418 mSv/Gy.cm(2) and from 0.213 mSv/Gy.cm(2) to 0.443 mSv/Gy.cm(2), respectively. These findings are expected to contribute to establishing optimal electromagnetic radiation exposure limits, promoting the safe management of medical electromagnetic radiation, and preventing excessive radiation exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Screening for Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Patients [J].
Berger, Jeffrey S. ;
Jordan, Courtney O. ;
Lloyd-Jones, Donald ;
Blumenthal, Roger S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (12) :1169-1177
[2]   Monte Carlo study of patient and medical staff radiation exposures during interventional cardiology [J].
Bhar, M. ;
Mora, S. ;
Kadri, O. ;
Zein, S. ;
Manai, K. ;
Incerti, S. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 82 :200-210
[3]   Interventional cardiovascular procedures in Belgium: Effective dose and conversion factors [J].
Bogaert, E. ;
Bacher, K. ;
Thierens, H. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) :77-82
[4]   Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [J].
Buls, N ;
Pages, J ;
Mana, F ;
Osteaux, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (893) :435-443
[5]  
Cranley K., 1997, CATALOGUE DIAGNOSTIC, DOI DOI 10.1088/0952-4746/18/1/026
[6]   2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging-Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness, Part 2: Radiological Equipment Operation, Dose-Sparing Methodologies, Patient and Medical Personnel Protection A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways [J].
Hirshfeld, John W., Jr. ;
Ferrari, Victor A. ;
Bengel, Frank M. ;
Bergersen, Lisa ;
Chambers, Charles E. ;
Einstein, Andrew J. ;
Eisenberg, Mark J. ;
Fogel, Mark A. ;
Gerber, Thomas C. ;
Haines, David E. ;
Laskey, Warren K. ;
Limacher, Marian C. ;
Nichols, Kenneth J. ;
Pryma, Daniel A. ;
Raff, Gilbert L. ;
Rubin, Geoffrey D. ;
Smith, Donnette ;
Stillman, Arthur E. ;
Thomas, Suma A. ;
Tsai, Thomas T. ;
Wagner, Louis K. ;
Wann, L. Samuel .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (24) :2829-2855
[7]  
ICRP, 2017, ANN ICRP, V46, P27
[8]  
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2020, Global trends in age-standardised cardiovascular disease death rate
[9]   HDRK-Man: a whole-body voxel model based on high-resolution color slice images of a Korean adult male cadaver [J].
Kim, Chan Hyeong ;
Choi, Sang Hyoun ;
Jeong, Jong Hwi ;
Lee, Choonsik ;
Chung, Min Suk .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (15) :4093-4106
[10]  
Kim M. J., 2018, Study on measures to secure accuracy of dosimetric indications of diagnostic X-ray equipment