Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injury in the first and second vaginal delivery and after a cesarean delivery: development and validation of an intrapartal model

被引:0
作者
Larsudd-Kaverud, Jennie [1 ,2 ]
Akervall, Sigvard [1 ]
Molin, Mattias [3 ]
Nilsson, Ida EK. [1 ,4 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [5 ]
Milsom, Ian [1 ,2 ]
Gyhagen, Maria [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, SE-41650 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Stat Consultancy Grp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Sodra Alvsborgs Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boras, Sweden
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Anal sphincter injury; Fetal biometry; Prediction model; Risk calculator; Vaginal delivery; Incontinence; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; BIAS; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111782
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To develop and validate prediction models for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in three birth scenarios (first vaginal delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean section and second vaginal delivery). Antenatal and intrapartal predictors were included in the models to construct a web-based, interactive, easy-to-use calculator. Study design and setting: All 45 maternity units in Sweden participated in the study, with 609,916 first and second deliveries in gestational week >= 37 + 0 with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentations between 2009 and 2017. The outcome was OASI, defined as a third- or fourth-degree perineal injury involving the external or internal anal sphincter muscles, or both. We analyzed the relative contribution of predictors with Nagelkerke's R-2 (R-N(2)) after minimization of the Bayesian Information Criterion for the predictor selection in a logistic regression with OASI as the binary outcome. Model performance was evaluated according to overall measures, discriminative ability, and calibration, with optimism-correction by a bootstrap procedure. Results: OASI occurred in 25,245 women (4.1%). There were 54 relevant, possible predictors, and 47 predictors were kept as candidates for the final models. We included 28, 40, and 46 predictors for the three scenarios, respectively. Infant birth weight was identified as the primary predictor, contributing 31%-45% of the R-N(2) in the full prediction models, which had R-N(2) values of 9.3%, 7.4%, and 12.9% for each scenario. In two-para women, obstetric information from the first birth was important at the second birth, accounting for 50% of the total predictive information. A sphincter injury in the first vaginal delivery strongly predicted a repeat injury (R-N(2), 40%). Vacuum delivery in the first and second vaginal delivery contributed 33% and 29% of R-N(2), respectively. By incorporating information on fetal biometry and labor events, the performance of the models increased substantially (eg, R-N(2) increased from 1.7% to 9.3% in the first scenario). An online calculator was developed (www.sphinctercalc.com). Conclusion: Fetal birth weight is the crucial predictor of sphincter injury, supporting efforts to assess fetal biometrics through imaging techniques. This also applies to obstetric interventions, particularly vacuum delivery, provided that there are alternatives to act upon. The proposed online calculator requires further international validation and refinement before it can be widely used clinically and for women's shared decision-making. (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]  
Collins GS, 2015, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V68, P112, DOI [10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1111/eci.12376, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1136/bmj.g7594]
[12]  
Coulter A, 1997, J Health Serv Res Policy, V2, P112
[13]   Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study [J].
D'Souza, Joanna C. ;
Monga, Ash ;
Tincello, Douglas G. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (10) :1747-1753
[14]   We need to treat pregnant women as adults Women should be consented for an attempt at normal vaginal birth as for operative delivery, with risks and potential complications explained [J].
Dietz, Hans P. ;
Callaghan, Sascha .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 (06) :701-703
[15]   Prevalence of and risk factors for failure of fetal magnetic resonance imaging due to maternal claustrophobia or malaise [J].
Dutemeyer, V. ;
Cannie, M. M. ;
Badr, D. A. ;
Kadji, C. ;
Carlin, A. ;
Jani, J. C. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 61 (03) :392-398
[16]   The risk of cancer risk prediction: "What is my risk of getting breast cancer?" [J].
Elmore, Joann G. ;
Fletcher, Suzanne W. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (23) :1673-1675
[17]   Informed consent and birth preparedness/complication readiness: A qualitative study at two tertiary maternity units [J].
Ely, Sally ;
Langer, Susanne ;
Dietz, Hans Peter .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 (01) :47-54
[18]   Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies [J].
Elze, Markus C. ;
Gregson, John ;
Baber, Usman ;
Williamson, Elizabeth ;
Sartori, Samantha ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Nichols, Melissa ;
Stone, Gregg W. ;
Pocock, Stuart J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (03) :345-357
[19]   Women's health 18 years after rupture of the anal sphincter during childbirth: I. Fecal incontinence [J].
Faltin, DL ;
Otero, M ;
Petignat, P ;
Sangalli, MR ;
Floris, LA ;
Boulvain, M ;
Irion, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (05) :1255-1259
[20]   Relative importance for linear regression in R:: The package relaimpo [J].
Groemping, Ulrike .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2006, 17 (01) :1-27