A Deep Learning Approach vs Optimized Machine Learning Models: A Comparative in Skin Cancer Classification

被引:0
作者
Vicente Nino-Rondon, Carlos [1 ]
Medina-Delgado, Byron [2 ]
Alexander Castro-Casadiego, Sergio [2 ]
Andres Hernandez-Perez, Camilo [2 ]
Cecilia Puerto-Lopez, Karla [2 ]
Andres Castellano-Carvajal, Diego [1 ]
Leonardo Camargo-Ariza, Luis [3 ]
Cecilia Gasca-Mantilla, Maira [4 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Fac Ingn & Ciencias, Cali, Colombia
[2] Univ Francisco Paula Santander, Fac Ingn, Cucuta, Colombia
[3] Univ Magdalena, Fac Ingn, Santa Marta, Colombia
[4] Univ Nacl Abierta & Distancia, Escuela Ciencias Basicas, Santa Marta, Colombia
来源
2024 IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SOCIETY, TEMSCON LATAM 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Skin cancer; Deep learning; Machine learning; Optimization; Comparative;
D O I
10.1109/TEMSCONLATAM61834.2024.10717678
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Currently, World Health Organization reports evidence that skin cancer has become more relevant in recent decades. Globally, approximately 32,000 cases of melanoma skin cancer and around three million cases of non-melanocytic lesions are reported annually. Timely identification of skin cancer contributes to timely and effective diagnosis and treatment in potential patients. A comparative analysis is presented between a deep learning approach using a custom-designed convolutional neural network and XGBoost and Random Forest models optimized with hyperparameters for skin cancer classification. The HMNIST skin lesion image descriptor dataset was used, and minority classes were balanced through oversampling with induced normal noise in the training dataset, increasing the number of image descriptor data from 18,891,264 to 88,362,288. The comparison was made based on weighted performance analysis of parameters such as accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, and specificity, as well as hardware performance, weighing training time and percentages of required CPU and RAM. The proposed model showed improvements of up to 6.03% in accuracy, 10.9% in precision, and 8.7% in f1-score in melanoma lesion detection. Additionally, the CPU utilization rate during training improved by 43%. The proposed deep learning model is presented as an alternative for timely identification and recognition of malignant skin cancer lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   AI-Skin: Skin disease recognition based on self-learning and wide data collection through a closed-loop framework [J].
Chen, Min ;
Zhou, Ping ;
Wu, Di ;
Hu, Long ;
Hassan, Mohammad Mehedi ;
Alamri, Atif .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 54 :1-9
[2]   On the Automatic Detection and Classification of Skin Cancer Using Deep Transfer Learning [J].
Fraiwan, Mohammad ;
Faouri, Esraa .
SENSORS, 2022, 22 (13)
[3]   Detection of Skin Cancer Based on Skin Lesion Images Using Deep Learning [J].
Gouda, Walaa ;
Sama, Najm Us ;
Al-Waakid, Ghada ;
Humayun, Mamoona ;
Jhanjhi, Noor Zaman .
HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (07)
[4]   Melanoma Skin Cancer Detection Using Recent Deep Learning Models [J].
Guergueb, Takfarines ;
Akhloufi, Moulay A. .
2021 43RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2021, :3074-3077
[5]   DeepSkin: A Deep Learning Approach for Skin Cancer Classification [J].
Gururaj, H. L. ;
Manju, N. ;
Nagarjun, A. ;
Aradhya, V. N. Manjunath ;
Flammini, Francesco .
IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 :50205-50214
[6]  
Pham HN, 2019, INT CONF SYST SCI EN, P142, DOI [10.1109/ICSSE.2019.8823129, 10.1109/icsse.2019.8823129]
[8]  
Karakheti Ashwin, 2022, Nepal Journal of Health Sciences, V2, P34, DOI 10.3126/njhs.v2i2.56791
[9]  
Li Jidong, 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI). Proceedings, P868, DOI 10.1109/IICSPI.2018.8690416
[10]  
Mohite V, 2020, MATER TODAY-PROC, V22, P1710