Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics

被引:5
作者
Jecker, N. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Atuire, C. A. [4 ,5 ]
Ravitsky, V. [6 ,7 ]
Ghaly, M. [8 ]
Vaswani, V. [9 ]
Voo, T. C. [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, African Ctr Epistemol & Philosophy Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Bioeth, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Bioeth & Humanities, 1959 NE Pacific St,Campus Mailstop 357120, Seattle, WA 91895 USA
[4] Univ Ghana, Dept Philosophy & Class, Accra, Ghana
[5] Univ Oxford, Ctr Trop Med & Global Hlth, Oxford, England
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Hastings Ctr, Garrison, NY USA
[8] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Res Ctr Islamic Legislat & Eth, Ar Rayyan, Qatar
[9] Yenepoya Univ, Ctr Eth, Dept Forens Med & Toxicol, Mangaluru, India
[10] SingHlth, Off Eth Healthcare, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Pluriversal view; Religion; Global bioethics; Epistemic justice; Public reason; DEFENSE; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11673-024-10410-7
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper sets forth and defends a pluriversal approach to religion in the context of an increasingly global bioethics. Section I introduces a pluriversal view as a normative technique for engaging across difference. A normative pluriversal approach sets five constraints: civility, change from within, justice, non-domination, and tolerance. Section II applies a pluriversal approach to religion. It argues that this approach is epistemically just, recognizes diverse standpoints, and represents a productive, preferred, way to tackle global bioethics concerns. Section II also considers an opposing viewpoint, which holds that religious perspectives have no place in bioethics. We show that this viewpoint would have adverse effects on bioethics publishing, conferencing, and training programmes. The paper concludes (in Section III) that bioethicists should engage with people who hold different worldviews, including religious worldviews, and should do so in accordance with pluriversal ethical constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 394
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
[11]  
Audi Robert., 2011, Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199796083.001.0001
[12]  
Beauchamp T. E., 2019, Principles of biomedical ethics, V8th
[13]  
Bhakumi H., 2022, BIOETHICS, V33, P65
[14]  
Biggar N., 2009, RELIG VOICES PUBLIC, P151, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566624.003.0008
[15]   Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine [J].
Biggar, Nigel .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 41 (03) :229-233
[16]   Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology [J].
Blaser, Mario .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2013, 54 (05) :547-568
[17]  
Bretherton Luke., 2009, Religious Voices in Public Places, P85, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566624.003.0005, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199566624.003.0005]
[18]  
Cahill L S, 1990, Hastings Cent Rep, V20, P10, DOI 10.2307/3562778
[19]  
Callahan D, 1999, DAEDALUS, V128, P275
[20]   The Role of Normative Traditions in Bioethics [J].
Camosy, Charles C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (12) :13-15