A Framework for Heritage-Led Regeneration in Chinese Traditional Villages: Systematic Literature Review and Experts' Interview

被引:0
作者
Yang, Yang [1 ]
Hakimi, Hazwan Ariff [1 ,2 ]
Azmi, Nur Farhana [2 ,3 ]
Li, Kaiyi [2 ,4 ]
Duan, Bingyu [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Built Environm, Dept Architecture, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Fac Built Environm, Ctr Bldg Construct & Trop Architecture BuCTA, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaya, Fac Built Environm, Dept Bldg Surveying, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[4] Univ Malaya, Fac Built Environm, Dept Quant Surveying, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[5] Univ Malaya, Acad Malay Studies, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
heritage-led regeneration; Chinese traditional village; rural regeneration; rural revitalization; sustainable development; framework; TOURISM; AREAS;
D O I
10.3390/heritage8060219
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
With rapid urbanization and modernization, the deterioration of historical areas has become an increasing concern. While heritage-led regeneration has proven effective, most studies have focused on urban contexts. Rural traditional villages, particularly in developing countries such as China, face even greater challenges and remain understudied. This study addresses this gap by developing a framework for heritage-led rural regeneration, grounded in community-building theory and highlighting heritage capacity as a key driver of village revitalization. Using a two-round systematic literature review, 64 papers from Web of Science and Scopus were analyzed to construct the framework. It consists of two levels: a preliminary framework identifying five key dimensions-public participation, media platform construction, adaptive reuse, heritage industry development, and landscape maintenance-and an integrated framework further detailing 13 sub-dimensions within these areas. Expert interviews were then conducted to validate the framework and examine its practical implementation challenges and future development directions. This framework integrates community-building theory with heritage-led regeneration, offering both theoretical insights and practical guidance for revitalizing traditional villages in China and beyond.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Heritage-led urban regeneration: the case of "El-Shalalat District", Alexandria [J].
Abdelhamid, Mona M. ;
El Hakeh, Amira Hassan ;
Elfakharany, Mohamed M. .
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 13 (04) :703-727
[2]   Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews [J].
Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A. ;
Olenik, Nicole L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 4 (10) :1358-1367
[3]   Identifying parameters for a performance-based framework: Towards prioritising underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse in New Zealand [J].
Aigwi, Itohan Esther ;
Ingham, Jason ;
Phipps, Robyn ;
Filippova, Olga .
CITIES, 2020, 102
[4]  
Al-ameedee Raghad Mahdi Muoslim, 2023, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1129/1/012024
[5]   A Proposed Model of Assessing the Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings in Historic Jeddah [J].
Alhojaly, Rawan Abdullatif ;
Alawad, Abeer Abdulaziz ;
Ghabra, Noura Abdulrahman .
BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (04)
[6]   Analysis of landscape changes as an indicator for environmental monitoring [J].
Alphan, Hakan .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 189 (01)
[7]  
Alseragy A., 2018, P 6 INT C HER SUST D
[8]   Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings: From a Literature Review to a Model of Practice [J].
Arfa, Fatemeh Hedieh ;
Zijlstra, Hielkje ;
Lubelli, Barbara ;
Quist, Wido .
HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT-POLICY & PRACTICE, 2022, 13 (02) :148-170
[9]   Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide. [J].
Beelmann, Andreas .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 11 (03) :244-245
[10]   Applying the MOA (motivation-opportunity-ability) model for the evaluation of residents' participation in built heritage rehabilitation: the case of Constantine [J].
Benedjma, Iqbal ;
Mahimoud, Aissa .
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 11 (01) :18-38