Optimising learning from interactive visualisations with drawing prompts

被引:0
作者
Stieff, Mike [1 ]
Scheiter, Katharina [2 ]
Ainsworth, Shaaron [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Learning Sci Res Inst, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Potsdam, Dept Educ Sci, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Univ Nottingham, Learning Sci Res Inst, Sch Educ, Nottingham, England
关键词
Drawing; visualisations; model-based reasoning; science education; GENERATED DRAWINGS; SCIENCE; REPRESENTATIONS; SIMULATIONS; UNDERSTAND;
D O I
10.1080/09500693.2024.2430803
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Interactive visualisations (IVs) have demonstrated success for improving learning in science classrooms. However, for this success to be realised, it is important that learners adopt an effective learning strategy. In three studies, we explored if drawing is such a strategy and, if so, what scaffolds might enhance its use. Compared to drawing from written text where almost invariably drawing is helpful, extant research on the efficacy of drawing for promoting learning from IVs is contradictory. Consequently, in Study 1 we first addressed whether drawing with IVs is beneficial by comparing this strategy to summarising when learners studied chemical equilibria with only text or with an IV. As we found drawing with IVs was effective, two subsequent studies explored if this could be further enhanced by scaffolding learners' drawing by providing structured prompts and example sketches. Contrary to other research, we did not find evidence that these scaffolds further enhanced learning by drawing. These results add important evidence for the efficacy and limitations of drawing for learning with IVs.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   Why Sketching May Aid Learning From Science Texts: Contrasting Sketching With Written Explanations [J].
Scheiter, Katharina ;
Schleinschok, Katrin ;
Ainsworth, Shaaron .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2017, 9 (04) :866-882
[32]   Why do learners who draw perform well? Investigating the role of visualization, generation and externalization in learner-generated drawing [J].
Schmidgall, Steffen P. ;
Eitel, Alexander ;
Scheiter, Katharina .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2019, 60 :138-153
[33]  
Schneider W., 2007, LGVT 6-12. Lesegeschwindigkeits- und-verstandnistest fur die Klassen 6-12
[34]   Drawing as a Generative Activity and Drawing as a Prognostic Activity [J].
Schwamborn, Annett ;
Mayer, Richard E. ;
Thillmann, Hubertina ;
Leopold, Claudia ;
Leutner, Detlev .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 102 (04) :872-879
[35]  
Stieff M., 2012, The connected chemistry curriculum
[36]   Sketching, not representational competence, predicts improved science learning [J].
Stieff, Mike ;
DeSutter, Dane .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2021, 58 (01) :128-156
[37]   Improving Representational Competence using Molecular Simulations Embedded in Inquiry Activities [J].
Stieff, Mike .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2011, 48 (10) :1137-1158
[38]   Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning frorn content area text [J].
Van Meter, P ;
Aleksic, M ;
Schwartz, A ;
Garner, J .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 31 (02) :142-166
[39]   The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis [J].
Van Meter, P ;
Garner, J .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2005, 17 (04) :285-325
[40]  
Van Meter P., 2013, Learning through visual displays, p247 280