Comparing factor mixture modeling and conditional Gaussian mixture variational autoencoders for cognitive profile clustering

被引:0
作者
Orsoni, Matteo [1 ]
Giovagnoli, Sara [1 ]
Garofalo, Sara [1 ]
Mazzoni, Noemi [1 ]
Spinoso, Matilde [1 ]
Benassi, Mariagrazia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Psychol, Bologna, Italy
关键词
variational autoencoders; clustering; machine learning; cognitive profiles; factor mixture modeling;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1474292
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Introduction Understanding individual cognitive profiles is crucial for developing personalized educational interventions, as cognitive differences can significantly impact how students learn. While traditional methods like factor mixture modeling (FMM) have proven robust for identifying latent cognitive structures, recent advancements in deep learning may offer the potential to capture more intricate and complex cognitive patterns.Methods This study compares FMM (specifically, FMM-1 and FMM-2 models using age as a covariate) with a Conditional Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoder (CGMVAE). The comparison utilizes six cognitive dimensions obtained from the PROFFILO assessment game.Results The FMM-1 model, identified as the superior FMM solution, yielded two well-separated clusters (Silhouette score = 0.959). These clusters represent distinct average cognitive levels, with age significantly predicting class membership. In contrast, the CGMVAE identified ten more nuanced cognitive profiles, exhibiting clear developmental trajectories across different age groups. Notably, one dominant cluster (Cluster 9) showed an increase in representation from 44 to 54% with advancing age, indicating a normative developmental pattern. Other clusters displayed diverse profiles, ranging from subtle domain-specific strengths to atypical profiles characterized by significant deficits balanced by compensatory abilities.Discussion These findings highlight a trade-off between the methodologies. FMM provides clear, interpretable groupings suitable for broad classification purposes. Conversely, CGMVAE reveals subtle, non-linear variations in cognitive profiles, potentially reflecting complex developmental pathways. Despite practical challenges associated with CGMVAE's complexity and potential cluster overlap, its capacity to uncover nuanced cognitive patterns demonstrates significant promise for informing the development of highly tailored educational strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework [J].
Akiba, Takuya ;
Sano, Shotaro ;
Yanase, Toshihiko ;
Ohta, Takeru ;
Koyama, Masanori .
KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, :2623-2631
[2]  
Altun A., 2016, Understanding Cognitive Profiles in Designing Personalized Learning Environments, P259, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-47724-314, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47724-314]
[3]  
Bezdek J. C., 1981, Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms
[4]  
Biewald Lukas, 2020, Experiment tracking with weights and biases
[5]  
Calinski T., 1974, Communications in Statistics, V3, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/03610927408827101, 10.1080/03610927408827101]
[6]   Models and Strategies for Factor Mixture Analysis: An Example Concerning the Structure Underlying Psychological Disorders [J].
Clark, Shaunna L. ;
Muthen, Bengt ;
Kaprio, Jaakko ;
D'Onofrio, Brian M. ;
Viken, Richard ;
Rose, Richard J. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (04) :681-703
[7]   CLUSTER SEPARATION MEASURE [J].
DAVIES, DL ;
BOULDIN, DW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1979, 1 (02) :224-227
[8]   An embedded deep-clustering-based load profiling framework [J].
Eskandarnia, Elham ;
Al-Ammal, Hesham M. ;
Ksantini, Riadh .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 78
[9]   Attentional and executive function behaviours in children with poor working memory [J].
Gathercole, Susan E. ;
Alloway, Tracy P. ;
Kirkwood, Hannah J. ;
Elliott, Julian G. ;
Holmes, Joni ;
Hilton, Kerry A. .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 18 (02) :214-223
[10]   Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Latent Profile Analysis, and Factor Mixture Modeling of the Syndromes of the Child Behavior Checklist and Teacher Report Form [J].
Gomez, Rapson ;
Vance, Alasdair .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 26 (04) :1307-1316