Towards a climate-resilient conservation network in Portugal

被引:0
作者
Araujo, Miguel B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alagador, Diogo [2 ]
Naimi, Babak [2 ,4 ]
Neto, Dora [2 ]
Rozenfeld, Alejandro [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Natl Museum Nat Sci, Dept Biogeog & Global Change, Calle Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
[2] Univ Evora, MED Mediterranean Inst Agr Environm & Dev & CHANG, Rui Nabeiro Biodivers Chair, P-7004516 Evora, Portugal
[3] Okinawa Inst Sci & Technol Grad Univ, Theoret Sci Visiting Program, Onna 9040495, Japan
[4] Univ Utrecht, Dept Biol, Quantitat Biodivers Dynam QBD, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Climate change; European biodiversity strategy; Post-2020 biodiversity targets; Natura; 2000; Optimization; Protected areas; Spatial conservation planning; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; PROTECTED AREAS; DISPERSAL CORRIDORS; SELECTING THRESHOLDS; EXTINCTION RISK; RANGE SHIFTS; DISTRIBUTIONS; BIODIVERSITY; PERSISTENCE; PROJECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111249
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In response to the European Biodiversity Strategy 2030, Portugal is updating its conservation plans to expand the coverage of existing conservation areas from 22 % to 30 %. This expansion is also required to accommodate biodiversity adaptation needs amid climate change. To this end, we have developed a protocol that employs biological data, species distribution models, and optimization techniques within a systematic conservation planning framework, to guide the expansion of conservation areas while considering the needs of species adaptation under climate change. The protocol formulates scenarios considering three species' conservation targets and two climate scenarios. It identifies potential range retention refugia, where species may continue to persist, and range displacement refugia, where species might be forced to redistribute due to changing climatic conditions. Using terrestrial vertebrates as a test case, two regions emerge as critical for species conservation through the 21st century: the central-western region along the Atlantic coast, projected as future displacement refugia, and the northeastern upland region, serving both as range retention and displacement refugia. Additional smaller areas are identified mainly across mountains and coastal areas of the country. Importantly, existing conservation areas already encompass high concentrations of species in range retention refugia, preserving nearly double the species richness found in non-conserved areas. The proposed approach ensures that conservation expansion is both scientifically sound and effectively contributes to the biodiversity goals of 2030, representing a significant improvement over traditional approaches that rely on bottom-up expert judgment and administrative expediency.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 138 条
[51]  
de Queiros Vieira Martins E., 1999, International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, V10, P247, DOI 10.1142/S0129054199000186
[52]   From ecological records to big data: the invention of global biodiversity [J].
Devictor, Vincent ;
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette .
HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF THE LIFE SCIENCES, 2016, 38 (04)
[53]   Evaluating Participatory Processes in Conservation Policy and Governance: Lessons from a Natura 2000 pilot case study [J].
Diez, Maria-Angeles ;
Etxano, Iker ;
Garmendia, Eneko .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2015, 25 (02) :125-138
[54]   Overlooked effects of temporal resolution choice on climate-proof spatial conservation plans for biodiversity [J].
Dupont-Doare, Ceridwen ;
Alagador, Diogo .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 263
[55]  
EC (European Commission), 2022, Criteria and Guidance for Protected Areas Designations
[56]  
EC (European Commission), 2020, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, DOI 10.2779/677548
[57]   A working guide to boosted regression trees [J].
Elith, J. ;
Leathwick, J. R. ;
Hastie, T. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 77 (04) :802-813
[58]   Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models [J].
Elith, Jane ;
Graham, Catherine H. .
ECOGRAPHY, 2009, 32 (01) :66-77
[59]   A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management [J].
Fagerholm, Nora ;
Raymond, Christopher M. ;
Olafsson, Anton Stahl ;
Brown, Gregory ;
Rinne, Tiina ;
Hasanzadeh, Kamyar ;
Broberg, Anna ;
Kytta, Marketta .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2021, 35 (09) :1848-1875
[60]   High-resolution temperature datasets in Portugal from a geostatistical approach: Variability and extremes [J].
Fonseca, André R. ;
Santos, J.A. .
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2018, 57 (03) :627-644