Relationship of T10-Pelvic Angle With Conventional Sagittal Parameters and Legacy Alignment Schemes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

被引:0
作者
Park, Se-Jun [1 ]
Kim, Hyun-Jun [2 ]
Park, Jin-Sung [1 ]
Kang, Dong-Ho [1 ]
Kang, Minwook [1 ]
Jung, Kyunghun [1 ]
Lee, Chong-Suh [3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Guri Hosp, Gyeongchun ro 153, Guri 11923, South Korea
[3] Haeundae Bumin Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Busan, South Korea
关键词
adult spinal deformity; alignment scheme; PJK; relationship; sagittal parameter; T10-pelvic angle; PROXIMAL-JUNCTIONAL-KYPHOSIS; LONG INSTRUMENTED FUSION; FAILURE; GOALS; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/21925682251333703
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design Retrospective analysis.Objective To investigate the relationship of T10-pelvic angle (T10PA) with conventional sagittal parameters and legacy alignment schemes.Summary of Background Data T10PA is a newly introduced sagittal parameter to predict the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). However, its relationship with conventional sagittal parameters and legacy alignment schemes remains unknown.Methods Patients with fusion from the pelvis to the upper-instrumented vertebra at or above the T10 were included. Based on the 6-week T10PA, the patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: undercorrection, functional alignment, and overcorrection. Conventional sagittal parameters and alignment status based on the Schwab's pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) modifiers and age-adjusted PI-LL were compared according to the T10PA groups. The PJK rates were compared among the alignment schemes.Results Overall, 219 patients were enrolled in this study. At 6 weeks postoperatively, 33.3%, 37.0%, and 29.7% of the patients demonstrated undercorrection, functional alignment, and overcorrection relative to the T10PA, respectively. Conventional sagittal parameters significantly differed according to the T10PA groups. Linear regression analysis revealed that T10PA was significantly affected by PI (beta = .562) and LL (beta = - .411). The correction statuses of the Schwab's PI-LL modifiers and age-adjusted PI-LL were significantly differentiated between the T10PA correction groups. However, only 32.9% of patients with functional alignment relative to T10PA belonged to matched correction category for the age-adjusted PI-LL. Overcorrection relative to age-adjusted PI-LL and T10PA significantly increased PJK risks.Conclusion T10PA significantly correlated with conventional sagittal parameters, particularly PI and LL. Although the T10PA correction status correlated with that of the legacy alignment schemes, a notable discrepancy in the optimal correction was observed between the T10PA and age-adjusted PI-LL schemes. Overcorrection relative to T10PA and age-adjusted PI-LL should be avoided to mitigate PJK development.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Functional Alignment Within the Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Improves Outcomes and Minimizes Mechanical Failures [J].
Ani, Fares ;
Ayres, Ethan W. ;
Soroceanu, Alex ;
Mundis, Gregory M. ;
Smith, Justin S. ;
Gum, Jeffrey L. ;
Daniels, Alan H. ;
Klineberg, Eric O. ;
Ames, Christopher P. ;
Bess, Shay ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Schwab, Frank J. ;
Lafage, Virginie ;
Protopsaltis, Themistocles S. .
SPINE, 2024, 49 (06) :405-411
[2]   Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Primary Adult Deformity Surgery: Evaluation of 20 Degrees as a Critical Angle [J].
Bridwell, Keith H. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Cho, Samuel K. ;
Pahys, Joshua M. ;
Zebala, Lukas P. ;
Dorward, Ian G. ;
Cho, Woojin ;
Baldus, Christine ;
Hill, Brian W. ;
Kang, Matthew M. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 (06) :899-906
[3]   Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion - Incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis [J].
Glattes, RC ;
Bridwell, KH ;
Lenke, LG ;
Kim, YJ ;
Rinella, A ;
Edwards, C .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (14) :1643-1649
[4]   Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comprehensive Review of Current Advances and Future Directions [J].
Kim, Hong Jin ;
Yang, Jae Hyuk ;
Chang, Dong-Gune ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Suh, Seung Woo ;
Nam, Yunjin ;
Park, Sung Cheol ;
Suk, Se-Il .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (05) :776-788
[5]  
Kim HJ, 2022, ASIAN SPINE J, V16, P440
[6]   Sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) for adult spinal deformity (ASD) more effectively predicts surgical outcomes and proximal junctional kyphosis than previous classifications [J].
Lafage, Renaud ;
Smith, Justin S. ;
Elysee, Jonathan ;
Passias, Peter ;
Bess, Shay ;
Klineberg, Eric ;
Kim, Han Jo ;
Shaffrey, Christopher ;
Burton, Douglas ;
Hostin, Richard ;
Mundis, Gregory ;
Ames, Christopher ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Lafage, Virginie .
SPINE DEFORMITY, 2022, 10 (01) :121-131
[7]   Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals Have the Potential to Reduce PJK [J].
Lafage, Renaud ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Glassman, Steve ;
Bess, Shay ;
Harris, Bradley ;
Sheer, Justin ;
Hart, Robert ;
Line, Breton ;
Henry, Jensen ;
Burton, Doug ;
Kim, Hanjo ;
Klineberg, Eric ;
Ames, Christopher ;
Lafage, Virginie .
SPINE, 2017, 42 (17) :1275-1282
[8]   Defining Spino-Pelvic Alignment Thresholds Should Operative Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Account for Age? [J].
Lafage, Renaud ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Challier, Vincent ;
Henry, Jensen K. ;
Gum, Jeffrey ;
Smith, Justin ;
Hostin, Richard ;
Shaffrey, Christopher ;
Kim, Han J. ;
Ames, Christopher ;
Scheer, Justin ;
Klineberg, Eric ;
Bess, Shay ;
Burton, Douglas ;
Lafage, Virginie .
SPINE, 2016, 41 (01) :62-68
[9]   Long-term benefits of appropriately corrected sagittal alignment in reconstructive surgery for adult spinal deformity: evaluation of clinical outcomes and mechanical failures [J].
Lee, Chong-Suh ;
Park, Jin-Sung ;
Nam, Yunjin ;
Choi, Youn-Taek ;
Park, Se-Jun .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 34 (03) :390-398
[10]   Proximal Junctional Failure after Corrective Surgery: Focusing on Elderly Patients with Severe Sagittal Imbalance [J].
Park, Se-Jun ;
Park, Jin-Sung ;
Lee, Chong-Suh ;
Shin, Tae Soo ;
Lee, Keun-Ho .
CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (06) :975-982