Financial Subsidies, Tax Incentives, and Innovation Quality: Empirical Evidence from High-Tech Enterprises in Sichuan Province, China

被引:0
作者
Liu, Qiuhong [1 ,2 ]
Othman, Rani Diana [3 ]
Kamarudin, Siti Nurhazwani [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Accountancy, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Panzhihua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Panzhihua, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Accountancy, Kampus Alor Gajah, Cawangan Melaka, Malaysia
[4] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Accountancy, Kampus Dungun, Cawangan Terengganu, Malaysia
来源
ASIA-PACIFIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING JOURNAL | 2024年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
Financial Subsidies; Tax Incentives; Innovation Quality; High-Tech Enterprises; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FIRM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Innovation has become a crucial driving force for economic development now. In 2023, the Sichuan Province in China ranked 10th nationwide in innovation capability, indicating the need for further breakthroughs. Between 2016 and 2020, the Sichuan Province witnessed a total of 35 companies going public, with 26 of them being high-tech enterprises, accounting for 74.29%. Therefore, the overall improvement in innovation capability needs to be built upon the original innovation capacity of high-tech enterprises. Financial subsidies and tax incentives are often used to improve innovation quality, but their effectiveness is a subject of controversy. This study selected 34 high-tech enterprises from the Sichuan Province listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges as research samples. Using relevant data from 2017 to 2022, the study empirically examined the impact of financial subsidies and tax incentives on the innovation quality of these enterprises. The research found that both individuals had a positive stimulating effect on innovation quality. However, when these two policies were implemented simultaneously, the incentive effect was weaker compared to the impact of each policy individually.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 152
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]   Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&D Input of Agricultural Enterprises? [J].
Jiang, Zhangsheng ;
Zhao, Xinzi ;
Zhou, Jie .
IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 :3339-3359
[22]  
Keogh W, 1997, TOTAL QUAL MANAGE, V8, pS196
[23]   Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies [J].
Klette, TJ ;
Moen, J ;
Griliches, Z .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (4-5) :471-495
[24]   Effect of R&D subsidies and tax credits on the innovative processes of Chilean firms [J].
Mardones, Cristian ;
Avila, Florencia .
ACADEMIA-REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ADMINISTRACION, 2020, 33 (3/4) :517-534
[25]   Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis [J].
Miotti, L ;
Sachwald, F .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (08) :1481-1499
[26]   Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models [J].
Montmartin, Benjamin ;
Herrera, Marcos .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (05) :1065-1079
[27]   Employee involvement in ideation and healthcare service innovation quality [J].
Mu, Yu ;
Bossink, Bart ;
Vinig, Tsvi .
SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (1-2) :67-86
[28]   Public R&D support and firm performance: A multivariate dose-response analysis [J].
Nilsen, Oivind A. ;
Raknerud, Arvid ;
Iancu, Diana-Cristina .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (07)
[29]   Synergy effect of science and technology policies on innovation: Evidence from China [J].
Pang, Shoulin ;
Dou, Shiting ;
Li, Huan .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10)
[30]   High-Quality Economic Development in Huaihe Economic Zone Level Measurement and Evaluation [J].
Sun, Xin ;
Fang, Shu ;
Zhang, Su .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2021, 2021