Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5T MR-Linac adapt-to-shape workflow

被引:0
作者
Liang, Jiayi [1 ]
Aliotta, Eric [1 ]
Tyagi, Neelam [1 ]
Scripes, Paola Godoy [1 ]
Cote, Nicolas [1 ]
Subashi, Ergys [1 ]
Huang, Qijie [1 ]
Sun, Lian [1 ]
Chan, Ching-Yun [1 ]
Ng, Angela [1 ]
Wunner, Theresa [2 ]
Brennan, Victoria [2 ]
Zakeri, Kaveh [2 ]
Mechalakos, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY USA
关键词
adaptive treatment; adapt-to-shape; MR-Linac; process map; radiation oncology; risk analysis; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; IMPLEMENTATION; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.70095
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background and PurposeThe adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow on the Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) allows for full replanning including recontouring and reoptimization5. Additional complexity to this workflow is added when the adaptation involves the use of MIM Maestro (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH) software in conjunction with Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Given the interplay of various systems and the inherent complexity of the ATS workflow, a risk analysis would be instructive.MethodFailure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) following Task Group 10013 was completed to evaluate the ATS workflow. A multi-disciplinary team was formed for this analysis. The team created a process map detailing the steps involved in ATS treating both the standard Monaco workflow and a workflow with the use of MIM software in parallel. From this, failure modes were identified, scored using three categories (likelihood of occurrence, severity, and detectability which multiplied create a risk priority number), and then mitigations for the top 20th percentile of failure modes were found.ResultsRisk analysis found 264 failure modes in the ATS workflow. Of those, 82 were high-ranking failure modes that ranked in the top 20th percentile for risk priority number and severity scores. Although high-ranking failure modes were identified in each step in the process, 62 of them were found in the contouring and planning steps, highlighting key differences from adapt-to-position (ATP), where the importance of these steps are minimized. Mitigations are suggested for all high-ranking failure modes.ConclusionThe flexibility of the ATS workflow, which enables reoptimization of the treatment plan, also introduces potential critical points where errors can occur. There are more opportunities for error in ATS that can create unintentionally negative dosimetric impact. FMEA can help mitigate these risks by identifying and addressing potential failure points in the ATS process.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Development and implementation of an automatic air delineation technique for MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy [J].
Ahunbay, Ergun ;
Parchur, Abdul K. ;
Paulson, Eric ;
Chen, Xinfeng ;
Omari, Eenas ;
Li, X. Allen .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (14)
[2]   Clinical implementation of deep learning contour autosegmentation for prostate radiotherapy [J].
Cha, Elaine ;
Elguindi, Sharif ;
Onochie, Ifeanyirochukwu ;
Gorovets, Daniel ;
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Zelefsky, Michael ;
Gillespie, Erin F. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 159 :1-7
[3]  
de los Santos LEF, 2015, J APPL CLIN MED PHYS, V16, P37, DOI 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5431
[4]   Adaptive Radiotherapy: Next-Generation Radiotherapy [J].
Dona Lemus, Olga Maria ;
Cao, Minsong ;
Cai, Bin ;
Cummings, Michael ;
Zheng, Dandan .
CANCERS, 2024, 16 (06)
[5]   Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of targets and organs-at-risk for magnetic resonance imaging only planning of prostate radiotherapy [J].
Elguindi, Sharif ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. ;
Jiang, Jue ;
Veeraraghavan, Harini ;
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Hunt, Margie A. ;
Tyagi, Neelam .
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 12 :80-86
[6]   Online adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancers on the MR linear Accelerator: Introducing a novel modified Adapt-to-Shape approach [J].
Gupta, Amit ;
Dunlop, Alex ;
Mitchell, Adam ;
McQuaid, Dualta ;
Nill, Simeon ;
Barnes, Helen ;
Newbold, Kate ;
Nutting, Chris ;
Bhide, Shreerang ;
Oelfke, Uwe ;
Harrington, Kevin Joseph ;
Wong, Kee Howe .
CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 32 :48-51
[7]   Adaptive Radiotherapy Enabled by MRI Guidance [J].
Hunt, A. ;
Hansen, V. N. ;
Oelfke, U. ;
Nill, S. ;
Hafeez, S. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 30 (11) :711-719
[8]   The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management [J].
Huq, M. Saiful ;
Fraass, Benedick A. ;
Dunscombe, Peter B. ;
Gibbons, John P., Jr. ;
Ibbott, Geoffrey S. ;
Mundt, Arno J. ;
Mutic, Sasa ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Rath, Frank ;
Thomadsen, Bruce R. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. ;
Yorke, Ellen D. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (07) :4209-4262
[9]   Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5 T MR-Linac adapt-to-position workflow [J].
Liang, Jiayi ;
Scripes, Paola Godoy ;
Tyagi, Neelam ;
Subashi, Ergys ;
Wunner, Theresa ;
Cote, Nicolas ;
Chan, Ching-Yun ;
Ng, Angela ;
Brennan, Victoria ;
Zakeri, Kaveh ;
Wildberger, Cassandra ;
Mechalakos, James .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (03)
[10]   The Effectiveness of a Pneumatic Compression Belt in Reducing Respiratory Motion of Abdominal Tumors in Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy [J].
Lovelock, D. Michael ;
Zatcky, Joan ;
Goodman, Karyn ;
Yamada, Yoshiya .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2014, 13 (03) :259-267