The Efficacy of Naso-Alveolar Molding on Premaxilla Pushback and Dentoalveolar Changes in Patients With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Objective:To evaluate the extent of naso-alveolar molding (NAM) in pushing the premaxilla posteriorly in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Background:Naso-alveolar molding application in cleft lip and palate cases bridges the cleft gap and increases nasal tip projection. In BCLP, NAM potentially mobilizes the premaxilla posteriorly to allow tension-free primary lip closure. However, some patients with BCLP with NAM history still necessitate osteotomy during labioplasty, questioning the efficacy of NAM for BCLP management. Methods:This single-center retrospective study was conducted using medical records of nonsyndromic patients with BCLP. Twenty-six patients with BCLP were enrolled over a 5-year period with a history of NAM application before primary labioplasty. The changes in premaxilla width (P), anterior arch width (A), posterior arch width (R), and anteroposterior projection of the premaxilla (P'-A') were statistically analyzed at 2 time points: (1) at the start of NAM application (T1) and (2) after completion of NAM before surgery (T2). Results:The average age at NAM initiation was 46.2 +/- 40.4 days, and the average duration of NAM usage was 125.14 +/- 62.94 days. A and P-A showed significant differences between T1 and T2 (P < 0.0001), whereas the rest did not show significant differences in value following NAM application (P > 0.05). Naso-alveolar molding successfully pushed back the premaxilla portion about 4.68 +/- 2.83 mm on average. Conclusion:Naso-alveolar molding can push back the premaxillary protrusion up to 5 mm, which can serve as a cutoff point for the consideration of combined modalities. Prenatal diagnosis, counseling, and cleft education should be the benchmark in cleft centers to improve overall patient outcomes.