The Upsurge of Impact Factors in Pediatric Journals Post COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Study

被引:3
作者
Mondal, Pritish [1 ]
Mazur, Lauren [1 ]
Su, Lilly [1 ]
Gope, Suparna [2 ]
Dell, Esther [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Penn, Dept Adm & Leadership, Indiana, PA USA
[3] Penn State Coll Med, Harrell Hlth Sci Lib, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
impact factor; Eigenfactor; bibliometrics; SNIP; publication bias; COVID-19; open access journals;
D O I
10.3389/frma.2022.862537
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Background Impact factor (IF) is a quantitative tool designed to evaluate scientific journals' excellence. There was an unprecedented upsurge in biomedical journals' IF in 2020, perhaps contributed by the increased number of publications since the COVID-19 outbreak. We conducted a cross-sectional study (2018-2020) to analyze recent trends in standard bibliometrics (IF, Eigenfactor, SNIP) of pediatric journals. We also estimated reference and publication counts of biomedical journals since publication volume determines the number of citations offered and IF. Methods Various bibliometrics of pediatric journals and reference/publication volumes of biomedical journals were compared between 2020 vs. 2019 and 2019 vs. 2018. We also compared open access (OA) and subscription journals' trends. Finally, we estimated IF changes in the journals of a different specialty, pulmonology. Results The study included 164 pediatric and 4,918 biomedical journals (OA = 1,473, subscription = 3,445). Pediatric journals' IFs had increased significantly in 2020 [median (IQR) = 2.35 (1.34)] vs. 2019 [1.82 (1.22)] (Wilcoxon: p-value < 0.001). IFs were unchanged between 2018 and 2019. Eigenfactor remained stable between 2018 and 2020, while SNIP increased progressively. Reference/publication volumes of biomedical journals escalated between 2018 and 2020, and OA journals experienced faster growth than subscription journals. IFs of pulmonary journals also increased considerably in 2020 vs. 2019. Conclusions We report an upsurge in pediatric journals' IF, perhaps contributed by a sudden increase in publication numbers in 2020. Therefore, considering this limitation, IF should be cautiously used as the benchmark of excellence. Unlike IF, Eigenfactor remained stable between 2018 and 2020. Similar changes in IF were also observed among the journals of another specialty, pulmonology.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Web of Science
[2]   Publication patterns' changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis [J].
Aviv-Reuven, Shir ;
Rosenfeld, Ariel .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (08) :6761-6784
[3]   Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Marx, Werner ;
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri ;
Kitas, George D. .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 32 (07) :1861-1867
[4]   Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals [J].
Brown, Ted ;
Gutman, Sharon A. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2019, 26 (07) :475-483
[5]  
Calculator Academy Team, 2021, Impact Factor Calculator
[6]  
Clarivate, 2021, Journal Citation Reports
[7]  
CWTS Journal Indicators, 2021, Journal Indicators
[8]  
EDP Sciences, 2021, 2020 Journal Impact Factors From Clarivate Reveal an Increase for All EDP Sciences Journals Indexed in Web of Science
[9]  
EIGENFACTOR.org, ABOUT US
[10]  
Elsevier, 2012, Elsevier Announces Enhanced Journal Metrics SNIP and SJR Now Available in Scopus