How does institutional quality influence opportunity entrepreneurship? A panel data analysis of OECD countries

被引:0
作者
Gaies, Brahim [1 ]
Vesci, Massimiliano [2 ]
Crudele, Chiara [3 ]
Calabro, Andrea [4 ]
Maalaoui, Adnane [5 ]
机构
[1] IPAG Business Sch, IPAG Lab, Paris, France
[2] Univ Salerno, Dept Business Sci Management & Innovat Syst, Via Giovanni Paolo II 132, I-84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
[3] Univ Salerno, Dept Phys E R Caianiello, Via Giovanni Paolo 2132, I-84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
[4] IPAG Business Sch, IPAG Entrepreneurship & Family Business Ctr, Nice, France
[5] MBSC Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Coll Business & En, King Abdullah Econ City, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Institutions; Opportunity entrepreneurship; Institutional anomie theory; Religious tensions; Instability of the polity; Panel data analysis; ECONOMIC-FREEDOM; POLITICAL-INSTITUTIONS; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; SELF-EMPLOYMENT; IMPACT; GROWTH; POLICY; LEVEL; ENTRY; RELIGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115291
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Institutional theory contends that high-quality institutions promote opportunity entrepreneurship. More recently, institutional anomie theory has underpinned more fine-grained investigations of some social institutions and their role in fostering opportunity entrepreneurship. Building on these theoretical frameworks, this study analyzes whether, how and which formal and social institutions matter for opportunity entrepreneurship. We test our hypotheses on 36 OECD countries over the period 2000-2014, adopting panel data techniques. The main findings suggest that not all institutions are able to increase opportunity entrepreneurship, while some high-quality institutions should be further promoted because of their positive impact on opportunity entrepreneurship. This is the case of regulatory quality (e.g., macroeconomic regulations; property rights and corruption control; socioeconomic conditions; and religion) that need to be tempered by secular values and rules to avoid the risk of a single religious group influencing society and/or governance and undermining opportunity entrepreneurship.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 167 条
[71]  
Estrin S., 2011, The dynamics of entrepreneurship: evidence from the global entrepreneurship monitor data, P181
[72]   Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? [J].
Estrin, Saul ;
Korosteleva, Julia ;
Mickiewicz, Tomasz .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2013, 28 (04) :564-580
[73]  
Evans DavidS., 1990, Small Business Economics, V2, P319, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00401628
[74]   Entrepreneurship, Economic Conditions, and the Great Recession [J].
Fairlie, Robert W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2013, 22 (02) :207-231
[75]  
Festus N., 2014, European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, V3, P104
[76]   Business cycles, unemployment and entrepreneurial entry-evidence from Germany [J].
Fritsch, Michael ;
Kritikos, Alexander ;
Pijnenburg, Katharina .
INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 11 (02) :267-286
[77]   Who Fills Institutional Voids? Entrepreneurs' Utilization of Political and Family Ties in Emerging Markets [J].
Ge, Jianhua ;
Carney, Michael ;
Kellermanns, Franz .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 43 (06) :1124-1147
[78]   Do institutions cause growth? [J].
Glaeser, EL ;
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-de-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2004, 9 (03) :271-303
[79]   Institutions, Latent Entrepreneurship, and Self-Employment: An International Comparison [J].
Gohmann, Stephan F. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 36 (02) :295-321
[80]   Political Empowerment, Rule of Law, and Women's Entry into Entrepreneurship [J].
Goltz, Sonia ;
Buche, Mari W. ;
Pathak, Saurav .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 53 (03) :605-626