Exploring the Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection for Breast Cancer Detection on Digital Mammograms

被引:0
作者
Bien, Sunhee [1 ]
Park, Ga Eun [2 ]
Kang, Bong Joo [2 ]
Kim, Sung Hun [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Bucheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Bucheon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY | 2025年 / 86卷 / 03期
关键词
Breast Neoplasms; Mammography; Artificial Intelligence; Computer-Assisted Diagnosis; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.3348/jksr.2024.0061
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose In this retrospective study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection (AI-CAD) for breast cancer detection on mammograms. Materials and Methods Mammograms from 269 women with breast cancer were analyzed. Cancer visibility was determined based on reports from experienced radiologists. Two expert radiologists assessed mammographic findings and breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) categories by consensus for cases of visible cancer. AI-CAD results were reviewed to determine whether AI-CAD correctly marked the cancer site. AI-CAD detection rates were analyzed according to mammographic findings, BI-RADS categories, lesion size, histologic grade, lymph node involvement, and stage. The concordance between the findings of AI-CAD and those of experienced radiologists was also assessed. Mammographically occult cases were defined as those with negative mammographic findings by two radiologists. Results AI-CAD detected 81.4% (219/269) of cancers, with higher detection rates occurring for larger lesion sizes, high histologic grades, lymph node involvement, and advanced stages. AI-CAD detection rates were higher for architectural distortion, mass, and calcification, but lower for asymmetry. Detection rates increased with higher BI-RADS categories and a higher number of mammography findings. Concordance between the assessment of AI-CAD and that of experienced radiologists was 88.5% (238/269). AI-CAD correctly detected 19.4% (6/31) of mammographically occult cases. Conclusion AI-CAD detected 81.4% of cancers, with substantial concordance with the findings of experienced radiologists. It correctly identified 19.4% of mammographically occult cases.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 406
页数:223
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040 [J].
Arnold, Melina ;
Morgan, Eileen ;
Rumgay, Harriet ;
Mafra, Allini ;
Singh, Deependra ;
Laversanne, Mathieu ;
Vignat, Jerome ;
Gralow, Julie R. ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Siesling, Sabine ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle .
BREAST, 2022, 66 :15-23
[2]   Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Bohm-Velez, Marcela ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Evans, W. Phil ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Boparai, Karan .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18) :2151-2163
[3]   Comparison of Diagnostic Performance in Mammography Assessment: Radiologist with Reference to Clinical Information Versus Standalone Artificial Intelligence Detection [J].
Choi, Won Jae ;
An, Jin Kyung ;
Woo, Jeong Joo ;
Kwak, Hee Yong .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (01)
[4]  
Dembrower K, 2020, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V2, pE468, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30185-0
[5]   Missed and True Interval and Screen-detected Breast Cancers in a Population Based Screening Program [J].
Hoff, Solveig Roth ;
Samset, Jon Helge ;
Abrahamsen, Anne-Line ;
Vigeland, Einar ;
Klepp, Olbjorn ;
Hofvind, Solveig .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (04) :454-460
[6]   Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41 [J].
Hooley, Regina J. ;
Greenberg, Kathryn L. ;
Stackhouse, Rebecca M. ;
Geisel, Jaime L. ;
Butler, Reni S. ;
Philpotts, Liane E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) :59-69
[7]   Mammographically occult breast cancers detected with AI-based diagnosis supporting software: clinical and histopathologic characteristics [J].
Kim, Hee Jeong ;
Kim, Hak Hee ;
Kim, Ki Hwan ;
Choi, Woo Jung ;
Chae, Eun Young ;
Shin, Hee Jung ;
Cha, Joo Hee ;
Shim, Woo Hyun .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2022, 13 (01)
[8]   Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study [J].
Kim, Hyo-Eun ;
Kim, Hak Hee ;
Han, Boo-Kyung ;
Kim, Ki Hwan ;
Han, Kyunghwa ;
Nam, Hyeonseob ;
Lee, Eun Hye ;
Kim, Eun-Kyung .
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2020, 2 (03) :E138-E148
[9]   Mammography screening interval and the frequency of interval cancers in a population-based screening [J].
Klemi, PJ ;
Toikkanen, S ;
Rasanen, O ;
Parvinen, I ;
Joensuu, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (05) :762-766
[10]   Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography [J].
Ko, Justin M. ;
Nicholas, Michael J. ;
Mendel, Jeffrey B. ;
Slanetz, Priscilla J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (06) :1483-1491