Time preferences and COVID-19 vaccination uptake

被引:1
作者
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ]
Antonini, Marcello [2 ,3 ]
Genie, Mesfin [4 ,5 ]
Torbica, Aleksandra [6 ]
Paolucci, Francesco [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, EsCHER, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[3] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[4] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Business Sch, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[5] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Hlth Econ Res Unit, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[6] Bocconi Univ, Dept Social & Polit Sci, I-20136 Milan, Italy
[7] Univ Bologna, Dept Sociol & Business Law, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; Present bias; Time preference; Vaccination; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; DISCOUNT RATES; RISK-AVERSION; REAL; REWARDS; METAANALYSIS; IMPATIENCE; SUBJECT; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-025-01801-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the evolving COVID-19 endemic phase, the emergence of new variants and viruses may necessitate renewed efforts to control their spread. Understanding how individual preferences and attitudes influence vaccination behavior is crucial in preparation for this. This paper presents results from a multi-country online survey conducted in 22 countries between July 2022 and June 2023. The survey elicited individuals' time preferences (discount rate and present bias) implementing choice list methodology and explored respondents' behaviors and attitudes for vaccination using respectively revealed and stated preferences data through a Discrete Choice Experiment. Respondents were classified as vaccine accepters (one or more COVID-19 doses at the time of the data collection), hesitant (willing to get the vaccine if given conditions are met) and refuser (no intention to get the vaccine). Overall, we found no evidence of a present bias, but substantial variation in discount rate between respondents across different countries. Minimal differences between revealed and stated preferences data were found. Hesitant respondents revealed larger discount rates compared to the vaccinated respondents, indicating a stronger preference for immediate outcomes. On the contrary, refusers showed lower discount rates, indicating stronger preferences for future outcomes. The high discount rate of the hesitant group may result in a low weight given to the consequences of a future COVID-19 infection. Hence, policymakers could specifically target hesitant people to make the long-term advantages of COVID-19 vaccinations, in terms of reduced infection probability and lower disease severity in case of infection, more salient, or to focus more on the short-term benefits of vaccination, for instance by stressing the improved access it may bring to social events and the reduced chances of getting sick.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   Intertemporal Tradeoffs for Gains and Losses: An Experimental Measurement of Discounted Utility* [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Bleichrodt, Han .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2010, 120 (545) :845-866
[2]   Are Time Preference and Risk Preference Associated with Cognitive Intelligence and Emotional Intelligence? [J].
Ackert, Lucy F. ;
Deaves, Richard ;
Miele, Jennifer ;
Quang Nguyen .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2020, 21 (02) :136-156
[3]   Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis of continuous associations [J].
Amlung, Michael ;
Vedelago, Lana ;
Acker, John ;
Balodis, Iris ;
MacKillop, James .
ADDICTION, 2017, 112 (01) :51-62
[4]   Discounting behavior: A reconsideration [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 71 :15-33
[5]   Using Preference Estimates to Customize Incentives: An Application to Polio Vaccination Drives in Pakistan [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Callen, Michael ;
Hussain, Karrar ;
Khan, Muhammad Yasir ;
Sprenger, Charles .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2023, 21 (04) :1428-1477
[6]   Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Sprenger, Charles .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) :3333-3356
[7]  
Angerer S, 2015, J ECON SCI ASSOC-JES, V1, P158, DOI 10.1007/s40881-015-0016-0
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ngene 1.2 User Manual and Reference Guide
[9]   Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries [J].
Antonini, Marcello ;
Genie, Mesfin G. ;
Attwell, Katie ;
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Ward, Jeremy K. ;
Melegaro, Alessia ;
Torbica, Aleksandra ;
Kelly, Brian ;
Berardi, Chiara ;
Sequeira, Ana Rita ;
Mcgregor, Neil ;
Kellner, Adrian ;
Brammli-Greenberg, Shuli ;
Hinwood, Madeleine ;
Murauskiene, Liubove ;
Behmane, Daiga ;
Balogh, Zsolt J. ;
Hagen, Terje P. ;
Paolucci, Francesco .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2025, 366
[10]   Public preferences for vaccination campaigns in the COVID-19 endemic phase: insights from the VaxPref database [J].
Antonini, Marcello ;
Genie, Mesfin G. ;
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Attwell, Katie ;
Balogh, Zsolt J. ;
Behmane, Daiga ;
Berardi, Chiara ;
Brammli-Greenberg, Shuli ;
Greenland, Andrew ;
Hagen, Terje P. ;
Hinwood, Madeleine ;
James, Carole ;
Kellner, Adrian ;
Kelly, Brian ;
Murauskien, Liubov ;
McGregor, Neil ;
Melegaro, Alessia ;
Moy, Naomi ;
Sequeira, Ana Rita ;
Singh, Renu ;
Torbica, Aleksandra ;
Ward, Jeremy K. ;
Yang, Dongyue ;
Paolucci, Francesco .
HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 13 (01)