Influence of Virtual Fencing Technology in Cattle Management and Animal Welfare

被引:0
作者
Gadzama, Ishaya Usman [1 ]
Asadi, Homa [2 ]
Hina, Qazal [3 ]
Ray, Saraswati [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sustainabil, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia
[2] Vali e Asr Univ Rafsanjan, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, Rafsanjan 7718897111, Iran
[3] Univ Vet & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Nutr, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
[4] Univ New England, Fac Sci Agr Business & Law SABL, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
来源
RUMINANTS | 2025年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
precision livestock farming; animal welfare; stress indicators; GPS-enabled collars; animal behavior; associative learning; grazing management; PASTURE; SYSTEM; FENCES; COWS;
D O I
10.3390/ruminants5020021
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Virtual fencing (VF) technology represents an innovative approach to livestock management, utilizing GPS-enabled collars to establish invisible boundaries through auditory and mild electrical stimuli. While VF offers potential benefits such as enhanced pasture management flexibility and reduced labor costs, its widespread adoption faces challenges including high initial investment costs, connectivity issues, GPS accuracy limitations, potential device durability concerns, and individual animal variability in learning and response. Furthermore, despite studies showing rapid learning and generally minimal long-term welfare impacts, questions remain regarding optimizing training protocols, addressing occasional short-term behavioral disruptions and collar abrasions, assessing long-term welfare effects across diverse systems (especially intensive and dairy), and improving scalability. To comprehensively assess the potential and limitations of this technology and guide its future development and implementation, a review integrating existing knowledge on the efficacy, welfare implications, and practical applications of VF in cattle production systems is essential. This review examines the efficacy, welfare implications, and practical applications of VF in cattle production systems. Studies demonstrate that cattle rapidly learn to associate auditory cues with electrical pulses, achieving high containment rates (>= 90%) within days, with minimal long-term welfare impacts as indicated by stable cortisol levels. However, short-term behavioral disruptions and occasional collar-related abrasions have been reported, particularly in dairy cattle. While VF enhances pasture management flexibility and reduces labor costs, challenges such as connectivity issues, individual animal variability, and high initial investment costs limit its widespread adoption. The findings suggest that VF is a promising tool for precision livestock farming, though further research is needed to optimize training protocols, assess long-term welfare effects, and improve scalability across diverse farming systems.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Is Virtual Fencing an Effective Way of Enclosing Cattle? Personality, Herd Behaviour and Welfare [J].
Aaser, Magnus Fjord ;
Staahltoft, Soren Krabbe ;
Korsgaard, Andreas Hein ;
Trige-Esbensen, Adam ;
Alstrup, Aage Kristian Olsen ;
Sonne, Christian ;
Pertoldi, Cino ;
Bruhn, Dan ;
Frikke, John ;
Linder, Anne Cathrine .
ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (07)
[2]  
Agar C, 2024, Ont. Farmer, VB, P10
[3]   Virtual fencing - past, present and future [J].
Anderson, D. M. .
RANGELAND JOURNAL, 2007, 29 (01) :65-78
[4]  
Anderson D.M., 2001, U.S. Patent, Patent No. [6,232,880 B1, 6232880]
[5]   Virtual herding for flexible livestock management - a review [J].
Anderson, Dean M. ;
Estell, Rick E. ;
Holechek, Jerry L. ;
Ivey, Shanna ;
Smith, Geoffrey B. .
RANGELAND JOURNAL, 2014, 36 (03) :205-221
[6]   Review: Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems [J].
Aquilani, C. ;
Confessore, A. ;
Bozzi, R. ;
Sirtori, F. ;
Pugliese, C. .
ANIMAL, 2022, 16 (01)
[7]  
Banks T., 2015, Design Week
[8]  
Bello R.W., 2019, Asian J. Math. Sci
[9]  
Bhargava K, 2016, INT CONF COMPUT NETW, P504
[10]   Using Virtual Fencing to Create Fuel Breaks in the Sagebrush Steppe [J].
Boyd, Chad S. ;
O'Connor, Rory C. ;
Ranches, Juliana ;
Bohnert, David W. ;
Bates, Jon D. ;
Johnson, Dustin D. ;
Davies, Kirk W. ;
Parker, Todd ;
Doherty, Kevin E. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 89 :87-93