Who should be responsible for setting standards for how automated vehicles are used? Insights of the US perspective from a 2021 nationwide survey

被引:0
作者
Kinero, Abdallah [1 ]
Kutela, Boniphace [2 ]
Das, Subasish [3 ]
Hossain, Ahmed [4 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 10555 West Flagler St,EC 3720, Miami, FL 33174 USA
[2] Texas A&M Transportat Inst, 701N Post Oak Ln 430, Houston, TX 77024 USA
[3] Texas State Univ, Coll Sci Engn, 601 Univ Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
[4] Texas State Univ, Ingram Sch Engn, Artificial Intelligence Transportat AIT Lab, Civil Engn, 601 Univ Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
关键词
Automated vehicles; Setting standards; Ordered logistic regression; user centered; POLICY; OPPORTUNITIES; GOVERNMENT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100718
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Automated Vehicles (AVs) are becoming widespread and are expected to revolutionize transportation, yet the standards governing their usage remain underexplored, particularly regarding who should set these standards. While the federal and local governments have traditionally played a key role, this study investigates public and community perceptions of who should be responsible for setting AV standards. Using data from 5111 responses in a nationwide Pew Research Center survey, ordered logistic regression assessed preferences for who should set AV standards: the federal government, users, companies/developers, and dealerships. Results show a strong preference for companies/developers to lead, followed by the federal government and users, with dealerships being the least favored. Preferences varied significantly by political ideology, gender, ethnicity, and income. Notably, respondents planning to use AVs and conservative Republicans supported greater user involvement in the standard-setting process. These findings suggest a growing demand for user participation alongside federal authority, which could enhance public trust and accelerate AV adoption. Policymakers are encouraged to consider these preferences in future regulatory frameworks to reflect diverse opinions and foster broader acceptance of AV technology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Adkisson S., 2018, SSRN Electronic J., DOI [10.2139/SSRN.3122393undefined-undefined, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3122393UNDEFINED-UNDEFINED]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, AV 4.0, US Department of Transportation
[3]   Autonomous vehicles: challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies [J].
Bagloee, Saeed Asadi ;
Tavana, Madjid ;
Asadi, Mohsen ;
Oliver, Tracey .
JOURNAL OF MODERN TRANSPORTATION, 2016, 24 (04) :284-303
[4]   Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Automation: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities [J].
Bathla, Gourav ;
Bhadane, Kishor ;
Singh, Rahul Kumar ;
Kumar, Rajneesh ;
Aluvalu, Rajanikanth ;
Krishnamurthi, Rajalakshmi ;
Kumar, Adarsh ;
Thakur, R. N. ;
Basheer, Shakila .
MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
[5]  
Bayless S.H., 2019, Driverless cars and accessibility, P1
[6]   Sensing system of environmental perception technologies for driverless vehicle: A review of state of the art and challenges [J].
Chen, Qiping ;
Xie, Yinfei ;
Guo, Shifeng ;
Bai, Jie ;
Shu, Qiang .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2021, 319
[7]   Engaging citizens in driverless mobility: Insights from a global dialogue for research, design and policy [J].
Chng, Samuel ;
Kong, Penny ;
Lim, Pei Yi ;
Cornet, Henriette ;
Cheah, Lynette .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 11
[8]   The Driverless Bus: An Analysis of Public Perceptions and Acceptability [J].
Eugenia Lopez-Lambas, M. ;
Alonso, Andrea .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
[9]   Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations [J].
Fagnant, Daniel J. ;
Kockelman, Kara .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 77 :167-181
[10]   Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California [J].
Favaro, Francesca M. ;
Nader, Nazanin ;
Eurich, Sky O. ;
Tripp, Michelle ;
Varadaraju, Naresh .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09)