Cognitive Biases in Strategic Decision-Making

被引:0
作者
Midtgard, Kenneth [1 ]
Selart, Marcus [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Econ, Dept Strategy & Management, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
关键词
cognitive biases; strategic decision-making; strategic choice; organizational change; consultant-client relationship; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; WEB SURVEYS; LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATIONS; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; ALLIANCE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/admsci15060227
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article examines to what degree organizations use strategies that focus on maximizing shareholder value (Theory E) as opposed to strategies emphasizing the development of organizational capability (Theory O). Our main goal is to investigate the extent to which cognitive biases influenced strategic decision-making pertaining to organizational change. Strategic decision-making and organizational change both have a great impact on collaborative behavior. A survey was developed that measured different aspects of the cognitive perspective in strategic decision-making. It was distributed to managers of several medium-sized organizations in Scandinavia (n = 119). The results indicate that managers used mixed strategies (Theory E and O). The results also reveal that illusions of control together with beliefs about change processes skewed the application of strategies towards Theory E. The theoretical and practical implications of the results were finally discussed, expanding the cognitive perspective in strategic decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]   Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review [J].
Acciarini, Chiara ;
Brunetta, Federica ;
Boccardelli, Paolo .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (03) :638-652
[2]   EMPIRICAL TEST OF A NEW THEORY OF HUMAN NEEDS [J].
ALDERFER, CP .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1969, 4 (02) :142-175
[4]   DOES ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE MATTER? ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE STRUCTURE, FUNCTIONING AND EFFECTIVENESS [J].
Andersen, Jon ;
Jonsson, Patrik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2006, 3 (03) :237-263
[5]   PERSEVERANCE OF SOCIAL THEORIES - THE ROLE OF EXPLANATION IN THE PERSISTENCE OF DISCREDITED INFORMATION [J].
ANDERSON, CA ;
LEPPER, MR ;
ROSS, L .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 39 (06) :1037-1049
[6]   Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995-2008: A Meta-analytic Review and Guidelines for Survey Researchers [J].
Anseel, Frederik ;
Lievens, Filip ;
Schollaert, Eveline ;
Choragwicka, Beata .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (03) :335-349
[7]   Change process: a key enabler for building resilient SMEs [J].
Ates, Aylin ;
Bititci, Umit .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) :5601-5618
[8]  
Bang H, 2011, ORGANISASJONSKULTUR
[9]  
Beer M, 2000, HARVARD BUS REV, V78, P133
[10]   How to develop an organization capable of sustained nigh performance: Embrace the drive for results-capability development paradox [J].
Beer, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 29 (04) :233-247