共 54 条
Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review
被引:2
作者:
Zace, Drieda
[1
]
Semeraro, Federico
[2
]
Schnaubelt, Sebastian
[3
,4
,5
]
Montomoli, Jonathan
[6
]
Ristagno, Giuseppe
[7
,8
]
Fijacko, Nino
[9
]
Gamberini, Lorenzo
[2
]
Bignami, Elena G.
Greif, Robert
[10
,11
]
Monsieurs, Koenraad G.
[12
,13
]
Scapigliati, Andrea
[14
]
机构:
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Syst Med, Rome, Italy
[2] Maggiore Hosp Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Dept Anaesthesia Intens Care & Prehosp Emergency, Bologna, Italy
[3] PULS Austrian Cardiac Arrest Awareness Assoc, Vienna, Austria
[4] Emergency Med Serv Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[5] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Emergency Med, Vienna, Austria
[6] Infermi Hosp, Romagna Local Hlth Author, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Rimini, Italy
[7] Univ Milan, Dept Pathophysiol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[8] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Milan, Italy
[9] Univ Maribor, Fac Hlth Sci, Maribor, Slovenia
[10] Univ Bern, Fac Med, Bern, Switzerland
[11] Univ Torino, Dept Surg Sci, Turin, Italy
[12] Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Antwerp, Belgium
[13] Univ Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
[14] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, IRCCS, Inst Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Rome, Italy
来源:
RESUSCITATION PLUS
|
2025年
/
24卷
关键词:
Cardiac arrest;
Resuscitation;
Artificial intelligence;
Machine learning;
Deep learning;
Large language model;
Scoping review;
HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST;
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;
OUTCOME PREDICTION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100973
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in medicine, with growing interest in its potential to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA). However, the scope and characteristics of current AI applications in resuscitation remain unclear. Methods: This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on AI applications in CA and resuscitation and identify research gaps for further investigation. PRISMA-ScR framework and ILCOR guidelines were followed. A systematic literature search across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane identified AI applications in resuscitation. Articles were screened and classified by AI methodology, study design, outcomes, and implementation settings. AI-assisted data extraction was manually validated for accuracy. Results: Out of 4046 records, 197 studies met inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective (90%), with only 16 prospective studies and 2 randomised controlled trials. AI was predominantly applied in prediction of CA, rhythm classification, and post-resuscitation outcome prognostication. Machine learning was the most commonly used method (50% of studies), followed by deep learning and, less frequently, natural language processing. Reported performance was generally high, with AUROC values often exceeding 0.85; however, external validation was rare and real-world implementation limited. Conclusions: While AI applications in resuscitation demonstrate encouraging performance in prediction and decision support tasks, clear evidence of improved patient outcomes or routine clinical use remains limited. Future research should focus on prospective validation, equity in data sources, explainability, and seamless integration of AI tools into clinical workflows.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文