Effect of Esketamine Compared with Sufentanil Combined with Propofol in Patients Undergoing First Trimester Surgical Abortion: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

被引:0
作者
Guan, Yingchao [1 ]
Wang, Haochen [1 ,2 ]
Cong, Xiaojing [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Beibei [1 ]
Lin, Yusong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Weihai Municipal Hosp, Cheeloo Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, 70 Heping Rd, Weihai, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Binzhou Med Univ, Sch Clin Med 2, 70 Heping Rd, Yantai, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
esketamine; hemodynamics; respiration; abortion; randomized clinical trial; SEDATION SCALE; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S515006
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Background: We explored whether esketamine anesthesia during first-trimester surgical abortion can reduce intraoperative hemodynamic fluctuations and improve patients' respiratory function. Methods: A total of 197 patients who underwent a first-trimester surgical abortion were included in the analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to either the esketamine anesthesia group (group E, n=98) or sufentanil anesthesia group (group S, n=99). The primary outcomes were systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PetCO2) during the surgery. Secondary outcomes included body movement, apnea, hypoxemia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dizziness, anesthesia recovery time, Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) score, and postoperative pain. Results: Patients in Group E had a more stable intraoperative SBP (p=0.001), DBP (p=0.014), MBP (p=0.003), and HR (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in intraoperative RR between the two groups (p=0.108); however, PetCO2 in group E remained at preoperative levels, whereas it increased in group S during surgery (p<0.001). The risk of apnea and hypoxemia in group E was lower (RR 0.32, 95% CI [0.13, 0.76], p=0.006; RR 0.13, 95% CI [0.03, 0.54], p=0.001). The incidence of intraoperative body movement (50% vs 27%, p=0.003), postoperative dizziness (45% vs 30%, p=0.024), and nausea (7% vs 0%, p=0.007) was higher in group E. There were no differences in anesthesia recovery time, postoperative RASS score, pain, or vomiting. Conclusion: Compared with sufentanil, esketamine anesthesia during the first trimester surgical abortion can maintain stable intraoperative hemodynamics and respiratory function during surgery and reduce apnea and hypoxemia. Esketamine may increase the risk of dizziness and PONV after surgical abortion. Plain Language Summary: Induced abortion is a simple and common health care procedure. The combination of sedative drugs and anesthesia is currently the main anesthetic regimen for abortion. However, the choice of analgesic drug remains controversial. Esketamine is a promising alternative that has been widely used in painless treatment. However, reports on the use of esketamine in abortion surgery are insufficient, and its effectiveness and adverse reactions require further in-depth and comprehensive exploration. Therefore, we designed this prospective randomized controlled trial. We found that compared to sufentanil, esketamine anesthesia during first-trimester surgical abortion could maintain stable intraoperative hemodynamics and respiratory function during surgery and reduce apnea and hypoxemia, but might increase the risk of dizziness and PONV.
引用
收藏
页码:2873 / 2883
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Abortion
[2]   Prevention and Management of Common Adverse Effects of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients with Mood Disorders [J].
Ceban, Felicia ;
Rosenblat, Joshua D. ;
Kratiuk, Kevin ;
Lee, Yena ;
Rodrigues, Nelson B. ;
Gill, Hartej ;
Subramaniapillai, Mehala ;
Nasri, Flora ;
Lui, Leanna M. W. ;
Lipsitz, Orly ;
Kumar, Anil ;
Lee, Jung Goo ;
Chau, Edmond H. ;
Cao, Bing ;
Lin, Kangguang ;
Ho, Roger C. ;
Mansur, Rodrigo B. ;
Swainson, Jennifer ;
McIntyre, Roger S. .
CNS DRUGS, 2021, 35 (09) :925-934
[3]   Analysis of the efficacy of subclinical doses of esketamine in combination with propofol in non-intubated general anesthesia procedures-a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Haoming ;
Ding, Xizhi ;
Xiang, Guilin ;
Xu, Liu ;
Liu, Qian ;
Fu, Qiang ;
Li, Peng .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
[4]   Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial [J].
Chen, Jiejuan ;
Zou, Xiaohua ;
Hu, Bailong ;
Yang, Yang ;
Wang, Feng ;
Zhou, Qian ;
Shen, Minhuan .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
[5]   The ED95 of Nalbuphine in Outpatient-Induced Abortion Compared to Equivalent Sufentanil [J].
Chen, Limei ;
Zhou, Yamei ;
Cai, Yaoyao ;
Bao, Nana ;
Xu, Xuzhong ;
Shi, Beibei .
BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 123 (02) :202-206
[6]   Safety and tolerability of esketamine in propofol based sedation for endoscopic variceal ligation with or without injection sclerotherapy: Randomized controlled trial [J].
Chen, Yuanjing ;
Chen, Jie ;
Wang, Quankai ;
Lyu, Hongyao ;
Chen, Xuehan ;
Liu, Rui ;
Wang, Ting ;
Dan, Ling ;
Huang, He ;
Duan, Guangyou .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 35 (07) :845-854
[7]  
CHERNIK DA, 1990, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V10, P244
[8]  
Deeks JJ, 2010, Statistical algorithms in review manager 5
[9]   The effectiveness of a low-dose esketamine versus an alfentanil adjunct to propofol sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography A randomised controlled multicentre trial [J].
Eberl, Susanne ;
Koers, Lena ;
van Hooft, Jeanine ;
de Jong, Edwin ;
Hermanides, Jeroen ;
Hollmann, Markus W. ;
Preckel, Benedikt .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 37 (05) :394-401
[10]   Ketamine Activates Breathing and Abolishes the Coupling between Loss of Consciousness and Upper Airway Dilator Muscle Dysfunction [J].
Eikermann, Matthias ;
Grosse-Sundrup, Martina ;
Zaremba, Sebastian ;
Henry, Mark E. ;
Bittner, Edward A. ;
Hoffmann, Ulrike ;
Chamberlin, Nancy L. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 116 (01) :35-46