Impact of trait anxiety on computational mechanism of approach-avoidance conflict decision

被引:0
作者
Liu, Haixin [1 ]
Wang, Jinxia [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Siyuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xinqi [1 ]
Li, Hong [1 ,3 ]
Dou, Haoran [1 ]
Lei, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Normal Univ, Inst Brain & Psychol Sci, 5 Jingan Rd, Chengdu 610068, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Psychol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] South China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Trait anxiety; approach-avoidance conflict; drift diffusion model (DDM); decision-making; computational model; DRIFT-DIFFUSION MODEL; HUMAN HIPPOCAMPUS; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; FIELD-THEORY; TIME-COURSE; REWARD; DEPRESSION; PUNISHMENT; PARAMETERS; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2025.2519665
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How do individuals with trait anxiety perform in an approach-avoidance (ap-av) conflict situation? To answer this question, we employed computational models to explore the effect of trait anxiety on decisions in ap-av conflict situations and uncover the computational mechanism involved in resolving such conflicts. Sixty-seven participants with high or low trait anxiety completed the ap-av conflict task, which was analysed using the hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM). Anxiety levels were assessed during both baseline and six-month follow-up sessions. Results showed that, during ap-av conflict decision-making, the reaction time of the high trait anxiety group was slower than that of the low trait anxiety group. The slower reaction time in the high trait anxiety group was due to a longer non-decision time. However, the intercept of drift rate and the effect of reward and aversion on drift rate significantly increased in the high trait anxiety group compared to the low trait anxiety group. The high trait anxiety group had a starting point closer to avoidance decisions. This study provides evidence that individuals with high and low trait anxiety manifest distinct alterations in the underlying computational decision-making processes during ap-av conflict situations.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Abdullah D. M., 2021, Qubahan Academic Journal, V1, P81, DOI DOI 10.48161/QAJ.V1N2A50
[2]   Machine Learning for Anxiety Detection Using Biosignals: A Review [J].
Ancillon, Lou ;
Elgendi, Mohamed ;
Menon, Carlo .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (08)
[3]   Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis [J].
Armstrong, Thomas ;
Olatunji, Bunmi O. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (08) :704-723
[4]   Pathways towards the proliferation of avoidance in anxiety and implications for treatment [J].
Arnaudova, Inna ;
Kindt, Merel ;
Fanselow, Michael ;
Beckers, Tom .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2017, 96 :3-13
[5]   Neural Substrates of Approach-Avoidance Conflict Decision-Making [J].
Aupperle, Robin L. ;
Melrose, Andrew J. ;
Francisco, Alex ;
Paulus, Martin P. ;
Stein, Murray B. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2015, 36 (02) :449-462
[6]   A reverse translational approach to quantify approach-avoidance conflict in humans [J].
Aupperle, Robin L. ;
Sullivan, Sarah ;
Melrose, Andrew J. ;
Paulus, Martin P. ;
Stein, Murray B. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 225 (02) :455-463
[7]  
Aupperle Robin L, 2010, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, V12, P517
[8]   Human Hippocampus Arbitrates Approach-Avoidance Conflict [J].
Bach, Dominik R. ;
Guitart-Masip, Marc ;
Packard, Pau A. ;
Miro, Julia ;
Falip, Merce ;
Fuentemilla, Lluis ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (05) :541-547
[9]  
[白露 BAI Lu], 2005, [中国心理卫生杂志, Chinese Mental Health Journal], V19, P719
[10]   Measuring maladaptive avoidance: from animal models to clinical anxiety [J].
Ball, Tali M. ;
Gunaydin, Lisa A. .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 47 (05) :978-986