Working memory and attentional control abilities predict individual differences in visual long-term memory tasks

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Chong [1 ,2 ]
Vogel, Edward K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Inst Mind & Biol, 940 East 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Working memory; Recognition memory; Source memory; Individual differences; Attention control; GENERAL FLUID INTELLIGENCE; ADULT AGE-DIFFERENCES; DIVIDED ATTENTION; ITEM MEMORY; SECONDARY MEMORY; PROCESSING-SPEED; CAPACITY; TIME; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2025.104665
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Working memory predicts cognitive abilities like fluid intelligence (gF) and source memory. This suggests these abilities depend on working memory and attentional control. When attentional resources were occupied by a secondary task, previous research shows that source memory performance is more impaired than recognition memory, implying that working memory abilities exert less influence on recognition memory performance than source memory performance. Here, we directly tested if working memory and attentional control differences predict visual recognition memory performance across four experiments (n = 841 in total). Surprisingly, we found that working memory and attentional control nearly always predicted recognition memory performance as robustly as source memory (Studies 1, 3 and 4), with the exception of when rapid presentation rates exceeded the temporal limits of attention during encoding (Study 2). Additionally, source memory and recognition memory, regardless of encoding presentation rates across experiments, remained highly correlated across individuals. Together, our findings suggest that working memory and attention control resources play a role in performance of both recognition and source memory tests of visual long-term memory.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Shadows of the past - Temporal retrieval effects in recognition memory [J].
Schwartz, G ;
Howard, MW ;
Jing, B ;
Kahana, MJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (11) :898-904
[32]   The attentional blink [J].
Shapiro, Kimron L. ;
Arnell, Karen M. ;
Raymond, Jane E. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1997, 1 (08) :291-296
[33]   The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control [J].
Shipstead, Zach ;
Lindsey, Dakota R. B. ;
Marshall, Robyn L. ;
Engle, Randall W. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2014, 72 :116-141
[34]   The sensory timecourses associated with conscious visual item memory and source memory [J].
Thakral, Preston P. ;
Slotnick, Scott D. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 290 :143-151
[35]   Storage in Visual Working Memory Recruits a Content-Independent Pointer System [J].
Thyer, William ;
Adam, Kirsten C. S. ;
Diaz, Gisella K. ;
Velazquez Sanchez, Itzel N. ;
Vogel, Edward K. ;
Awh, Edward .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 33 (10) :1680-1694
[36]   Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks [J].
Troyer, AK ;
Winocur, G ;
Craik, FIM ;
Moscovitch, M .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) :467-474
[37]   Fluid Intelligence Predicts Novel Rule Implementation in a Distributed Frontoparietal Control Network [J].
Tschentscher, Nadja ;
Mitchell, Daniel ;
Duncan, john .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 37 (18) :4841-4847
[38]   IS WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY TASK DEPENDENT [J].
TURNER, ML ;
ENGLE, RW .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 28 (02) :127-154
[39]   Individual Differences in Long-Term Memory [J].
Unsworth, Nash .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2019, 145 (01) :79-139
[40]   The Many Facets of Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity [J].
Unsworth, Nash .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, VOL 65, 2016, 65 :1-46