The Effect of Different File Motions on the Formation of Apical Debris During Root Canal Preparation In vitro

被引:0
作者
Kurian, Athul B. [1 ]
Tansha, Rubal [2 ]
Singh, Rubal [3 ]
Mishra, Raman [4 ]
Arya, Ashtha [5 ]
Reddy, Smitha [6 ]
机构
[1] Consultant Endodontist, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] BJS Dent Coll, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[3] Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Gen Dentist, Karnal, Haryana, India
[4] Sharda Univ, Sch Dent Sci, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
[5] SGT Univ, SGT Dent Coll Hosp & Res Inst, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Gurugram, Haryana, India
[6] Sri Sai Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Vikarabad, Telangana, India
关键词
Adaptive motion; apical debris; file motion; reciprocating files; root canal preparation; rotary files;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1925_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: After root canal preparation, apical debris may cause discomfort and delayed healing. Rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive file movements affect debris extrusion. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted mandibular premolars with single root canals were randomly divided into three file motion groups (n = 20): Group A (rotary motion using ProTaper Universal files), Group B (reciprocating motion using WaveOne files), and Group C (adaptive motion using TF Adaptive files). Extruded debris was collected in Eppendorf tubes with teeth. Standard watering techniques prepared root canals. Drying and weighing extruded debris with a 0.0001 g analytical balance detected apical debris. Results: The average weight of extruded debris in Group A (rotary) was 0.120 +/- 0.005 g, Group B (reciprocating) was 0.180 +/- 0.008 g, and Group C (adaptive motion) was 0.140 +/- 0.006 g. One-way ANOVA analysis showed significant differences across groups (P < 0.05). The rotating motion extruded the least apical debris, whereas reciprocating action generated the most. Conclusion: File movements greatly affect apical debris production during root canal preparation. Apical debris is lowest with rotary motion, followed by adaptive and reciprocating motion.
引用
收藏
页码:S1402 / S1404
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Apically Extruded Debris with Reciprocating Single-File and Full-sequence Rotary Instrumentation Systems [J].
Buerklein, Sebastian ;
Schaefer, Edgar .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (06) :850-852
[2]  
Capar ID., 2016, Aust Endod J, V42, P30
[3]   Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium rotary instruments produced with a new manufacturing technique [J].
Gambarini, G. ;
Plotino, G. ;
Grande, N. M. ;
Al-Sudani, D. ;
De Luca, M. ;
Testarelli, L. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2011, 44 (04) :337-341
[4]   Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals [J].
Gunes, Betul ;
Yeter, Kubra Yesildal .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2018, 44 (07) :1191-1194
[5]   A COMPARISON OF WEIGHTS OF DEBRIS EXTRUDED APICALLY BY CONVENTIONAL FILING AND CANAL MASTER TECHNIQUES [J].
MYERS, GL ;
MONTGOMERY, S .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1991, 17 (06) :275-279
[6]  
Singh Abhishek, 2015, J Conserv Dent, V18, P405, DOI 10.4103/0972-0707.164055
[7]   Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment [J].
Tanalp, J. ;
Gungor, T. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2014, 47 (03) :211-221
[8]  
Vivekanandhan Paramasivam, 2016, J Conserv Dent, V19, P245, DOI 10.4103/0972-0707.181941