Total Hip Arthroplasty vs Hip Resurfacing in Patients Over 65: A Propensity ScoreeMatched Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes

被引:0
作者
Wong, Zachary [1 ]
Saluja, Anand [2 ]
Jordan, Louis Andrew [3 ]
Spaan, Jonathan [4 ]
Su, Edwin [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Coll Osteopath Med, Ft Worth, TX USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, Adult Reconstruct & Joint Replacement, New York, NY USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA USA
[4] Rush Univ, Med Coll, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Comparative effectiveness; Hip resurfacing; Older patients; Patient-reported outcome measures; Propensity-score matching; Total hip arthroplasty; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METAL; AGE; REPLACEMENT; SYSTEM; OLDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2025.101721
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hip-resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has grown in popularity as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA) but is primarily utilized and indicated in younger patients with sufficient bone stock and aspirations of returning to higher level of physical activity. While the mechanical structure of HRA implants allows for sparing of the femoral neck and more anatomical weight-bearing distribution, questions surround its viability in older patients, specifically those aged 65 years or older. We undertook this study to compare the results of HRA vs THA in a population of older patients, with specific focus on patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: A retrospective, propensity-matched study was conducted on patients aged 65 years or older who underwent either HRA or THA via posterior approach. Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, body mass index, and race. Patient-reported outcome measures, including Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, and modified Harris Hip Score were compared at preoperative, 6-week, 1-year, and minimum 2year follow-ups. Results: Seventy patients in each group were included. HRA patients demonstrated significantly higher Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement and Lower Extremity Activity Scale scores at 1-year and final follow-ups. Visual Analog Scale pain scores were lower, and modified Harris Hip Score was higher for HRA patients at the final follow-up. No revisions were reported in the HRA group while one revision due to infection occurred in the THA group. Conclusions: In carefully selected patients aged 65 years or older, HRA can provide comparable or superior outcomes to THA. However, the decision between HRA and THA should be individualized, considering patient factors and potential risks. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes [J].
LeBrun, Drake G. ;
Shen, Tony S. ;
Bovonratwet, Patawut ;
Morgenstern, Rachelle ;
Su, Edwin P. .
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 11 :229-233
[22]   Do cobalt or chromium accumulate in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients who have mild, moderate, or severe renal insufficiency? [J].
Manninen, E. ;
Lainiala, O. ;
Karsikas, M. ;
Reito, A. ;
Jamsa, P. ;
Eskelinen, A. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2021, 103B (07) :1231-1237
[23]   What Are the Benefits of Hip Resurfacing in Appropriate Patients? A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis [J].
McLawhorn, Alexander S. ;
Buller, Leonard T. ;
Blevins, Jason L. ;
Lee, Yuo Yu ;
Su, Edwin P. .
HSS JOURNAL, 2020, 16 (2_SUPPL) :316-326
[24]  
Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), 2012, Medical device alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements
[25]  
Mont MA, 2006, J AM ACAD ORTHOP SUR, V14, P454, DOI 10.5435/00124635-200608000-00003
[26]   A Comparative Cohort Study With a 20-Year Age Gap: Hip Resurfacing in Patients Aged ≤35 Years and Patients Aged ≥55 Years [J].
Morgenstern, Rachelle ;
Denova, Thomas Alastair ;
Ren, Renee ;
Su, Edwin P. .
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 7 :22-28
[27]   Return to Sport After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty [J].
Morse, Kyle W. ;
Premkumar, Ajay ;
Zhu, Andrew ;
Morgenstern, Rachelle ;
Su, Edwin P. .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (05)
[28]   A seven-zone rating system for assessing bone mineral density after hip resurfacing using implants with metaphyseal femoral stems [J].
Naal, Florian D. ;
Zuercher, Patrick ;
Munzinger, Urs ;
Hersche, Otmar ;
Leunig, Michael .
HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 21 (04) :463-467
[29]  
National Joint Registry (NJR), 2024, 21st annual report: hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty
[30]  
Nizam I, 2009, J ARTHROPLASTY, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.026